This is bullshit, it defined but didn't even use the continuous functions 🍇and 🍍.
this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
205 points (94.8% liked)
196
17490 readers
1931 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
golang is gonna be fuckin pissed when it finds out
IMSA kid?
Those are backups in case the other functions break down.
🍊 isnt a metric dumbass, its an orange
Americans will use anything other than metric
Its probably reasonable to say that 25% of math majors cant solve this, therefore non-math majors aren't people
"sup" without a "\" belongs-to-set symbol \[ and \]
scrödinger's TeX
I mean, technically, it is true. At least 25% of people can't solve that.
I can answer the question. No.
He’s right.
Yes I can, as this is just the metric induces by the L-infinty norm. But why did we introduce 🍇 and🍍?
Look at this shmuck, using the supremum of a continuous function on a closed interval when it clearly achieves a maximum. I bet they’ll feel real embarrassed about that one when they’re falling asleep years from now.
Christ, it's like people just don't even give a fuck about the extreme value theorem anymore?
I get you are joking, but I've seen many literature just using sup for maximum. Maybe for consistency or laziness, idk why
🍊🍊🍊🍊
By using 🍊 to rate how good this post is(out of 5), i made it a metric for how good this post is
I am waiting for someone to actually answer this
Thanks. I've mostly forgotten real analysis by this point but the meme seemed really familiar, lol.
Thanks for the link. I expected there would be a problem with triangle inequality but didn't want to do the actual proving 😅
Oh, I expected it to be some unsolved problem.
The function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.
Nyar!