this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
1118 points (95.5% liked)

Comic Strips

12957 readers
2056 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 152 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Can't shake the feeling that swapping panels 1 and 3 would make more sense.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 weeks ago

Clockwise from bottom left maybe

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 weeks ago

i think any order would work

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 151 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

the amount of billionaire taint licking in this post is depressingly high.

the hilarious thing about these apologists is that the majority of the 1% wouldn't even piss on them if they were on fire. we are beneath them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 4 weeks ago

No, no, we can’t be mean to the rich, that will upset them 🥺

[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

Yes, kill them, by taxing them out of existence.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

This would be ideal but I'm skeptical that it's actually possible. Bribes are cheaper than taxes, so I think they'd likely just prevent the taxes from happening by greasing the correct palms.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Well yeah, that’s exactly what’s happened for at least the past 50 years. In 1968 corporations were paying 53% of their profits in taxes, and billionaires were paying 94% around that time! Btw, if you’re making billions, paying 94% still leaves you richer than most…

Contrast that to today, where the system is so obviously broken during a time when Amazon is paying less in total taxes than a fry cook at McDonald’s.

It would need to be done with actually no loopholes, and meaningful enforcement of consequences for those who would try to cheat (perhaps the guillotine).

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

one big issue is everyone goes "you can't tax stocks!" and then billionaires take a loan against the stocks with the unrealized gains as collateral. So we'd need to start classifying a loan as a realized gain of the collateral against this, with an exception for mortgages on primary domiciles, maybe also a "first million dollars are exempt," calculated on the full debt of the borrower, not per loan. I can't imagine anyone taking out more than $1M in debt against a properly they don't live in is not the rich we need to be taxing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Yeah. Virtually anything with an exception for the first million dollars will both lose almost no tax revenue (as a percentage), and never ever touch the rest of us temporarily embarrassed not-quite-yet-billionaires.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 weeks ago

Don't they already just avoid paying taxes by not having a salary and just using bank loans or something? So they have no actual money in the bank

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 weeks ago

Every healthy society requires a robust guillotine maintenance capability, ideally across all competencies.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

I support this idea. Invite most of the world's nations' leaders, too. I think the Met-gala attendees and G20 summit attendees might be a good starting point all-in-all. Then seize the means of production etc., you know how it goes.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago

I'm for giving them a choice. The guillotine or we take away their money and make them work a minimum pay position in one of their factories for the rest of their lives. I'm pretty sure they would take the guillotine after a week.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

Billionaires use violence all the time to get what they want. Just because they hide behind layers of abstraction that they've set up, doesn't mean they aren't using violence.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

Don't tease me like this.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Why does the proletariat, the largest class, not simply eat the bougouise?

load more comments
view more: next ›