this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
297 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3535 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago

I'm sure the blue states won't have an issue losing the subsidies-dependent red states. I wonder where flyover country wants to get the money from to keep up their lifestyle.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Marjorie Taylor Dumbfuck here doesn't realize that her state, and in fact all Republican-led states, are solely dependent on blue state generosity in order to continue to exist. I'm sure the blue states would absolutely love for these freeloading welfare states to leave the union, because it would offer an immediate federal surplus that could be better allocated on themselves. It will never happen, because the smart conservatives love having a never-ending money faucet they can gargle when their economic plans fail due to their own ineptitude.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

Poetic, and agreed on all points. I stress because if these fucking morons are dumb enough to try, I have to predict it so I can get the fuck out before everything collapses.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 19 hours ago

Oh no, please, don't

[–] [email protected] 34 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

About the only thing that would make me happier than to have the entire pacific west coast secede and create a sovereign nation would be for Trump to do it for us so we don't have to fight a war over it. You want us gone? Please, show us the exit, we'll be on our way. No takebacksies.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Can the Northeast join? No one in MA for example wants to be part of MAGA Land.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Iirc one of ~~MA~~ ME electoral votes will go to Trump, ao nlt really no-one

Edit: I'm stupid. MA is Massachusetts which is blue af (every county iirc). Maine is ME

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

You mean Maine? MA doesn't split.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I am too confidently incorrect sometimes. I'm not from the US, I thought you meant Maine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

Maine is, sadly, ME. It's very weird. I think MN is Minnesota even tho MI feels more sensible but it's Michigan. I think they did their best given what they had to work with :(

[–] [email protected] 15 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

What did Colorado ever do to deserve this?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago

It would be great if Canada could peacefully annex "America" and leave 4th World Dumbfuckistan to themselves.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't threaten me with a good country.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can Canada take the coastal states?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

Can Minnesota come along too? We're basically in Canada here already.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

You folks talk with a Canadian dialect.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago

Yes. But please make sure to throw away your trash before you come live with us.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh look, a broken clock.

How many times do we need to keep this nation "united" at gunpoint before we acknowledge that the science and reason people are incompatible with the supply side Jesus and racial hatred people? We can't stand one another, and time only deepens that division until bloodshed, over and over.

You can't educate those cultures that refuse to be educated or have their children educated. That kind of change, born of desperation and constant struggle inflicted from your own culture's values needs to come from within. The Red States need their Martin Luther "maybe we shouldn't punch ourselves in the face every day" reformation moment, and it isn't rational for those that see beyond their ignorance and superstition be dragged down with them for generations until they get there. Blue states propping them up only prolong comfort in their ignorance.

You can't force cultural evolution or save the willfully ignorant from their own willlfull ignorance from outside on Alabama any more than you can on Afghanistan, all you do is create a common enemy for them, as we continue to experience.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

I have held this stance for many years (am not American though), and everytime I proposed it someone from the US told me "Nooo we've had that in the past and we fought a civil war in order to stay together!!! We can't split!" and I think it's like a broken marriage that was never easy to begin with that's just being held together because the parties are too stubborn to say "ok well let's split up". It's an unhealthy relationship.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 23 hours ago

Yeah, divorce yourself from all those states that send you money because you're too backward to care for yourself. Sounds like a great idea!

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If it weren't mainly a rural vs. urban split, I'd be all for the fascists getting their own country to ruin. But we're too spread out to make it feasible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago

If it weren’t mainly a rural vs. urban split, I

Yeah, we'd have to move them somewhere, perhaps down South.... Make the link around say Virginia... Sounds familiar, but I can't lay my finger on it...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, we'd essentially become three countries - the West, the East, and the No-Go Zone in the middle. Just get us New Mexicans to somewhere decent before all borders close.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Brother we don't even like the old Mexicans. You'll probably be in cuffs before someone can find the crayons to explain to trump the difference between Mexico and New Mexico.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You could all just join Canada if you want to stay connected.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

As a Minnesotan. Would love to.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A republican flip flopping on states rights again? I'm shocked.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago

'We have the right to tell you what to do. You cannot tell us what to do."

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Greene on Monday described these actions as a threat against Trump's "mandate."

That mandate calls for actions Democratic states must accept, Greene argued, such as the mass deportation of "illegal invaders" and preventing trans children from playing sports.

The funny thing is that MTG is getting less and less of a "mandate" from GA-14 for all of her crap: In 2020 she got 74.6 percent of the vote, in 2022 she got 65.9, and in 2024 she got 64.4. Keep it up Marge.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Still way, way, way too high for a white supremacist goblin in human form to get.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah, but she mainly represents white supremacist goblins in human forms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

Presidents don't get to mandate, they serve. She can fuck herself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How is it not illegal for her to say these things? Like is that a threat against the United States?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

A known traitor threat against the United States was allowed to run for and be elected president. This country doesn't have laws except for the poor and it certainly doesn't have a functioning system of justice or even government at this point.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (6 children)

Depends.

Protected by the first amendment, one can legally advocate for the dissolution of the Union ~~through bicameral ratification outlined constitutionally~~ by constitutional amendment. To advocate for armed insurrection or violent overthrow of the federal government is sedition and considered quite illegal.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 147 points 1 day ago (25 children)

.......yeah, ok. Sounds good.

moves to California

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›