I bought a phone for something like $20 which is very simple. It has no vibration. It has 65 KB of onboard storage. And it is not a smartphone. I don't even take it with me most of the time, because I know that nobody will call me anyway, so why bother. I use it very rarely. The most usage I have from it is calling, flashlight and maybe as a clock once every so often, since I have many actual clocks.

On the computer I use GNU / Linux. And I have no complaints.

So I don't understand why even bother with a smartphone in the first place?

PS: I would love to try Pinephone or Librem5 though.

GrapheneOS on modern Pixels, DivestOS on older or other brands.

Lineage and a fork, DivestOS are very close to Graphene, and run on far more devices.

The search for perfection is the enemy of good.

I've run Lineage for years on some spare devices. Battery life is so much better without Google Services.

My most recent device (Pixel 5 with DivestOS) is averaging 1.1% battery consumption per hour over the last day. That included an hour of navigation, using Google maps with microG services.

One old device runs longer with DivestOS than it ever did with stock, and the battery has lost 40% capacity. That's how bad Google Services eat battery.

Plus Lineage permits you to use a number of old devices, unlike Graphene. It's good, it gives you far more control than Google.

My final thought on Graphene - it needs to be taken over and lead by some professionals. Those folks act like stereotypical geeks of 30 years ago, arrogant, condescending (I worked with their type 30 years ago, and was a little like them then). They also denigrate anything less than what they deem "perfect". The very definition of hubris.

Their attitude is "if you have a problem you must've done something wrong, why did you do something wrong". Having that experience with them has put me off Graphene permanently.

Edit: I can re-lock the bootloader with Divest, so the condescending Graphene folks are just plain wrong about being the only OS that can do this. I don't lock it, because my threat model doesn't require it. The odds of my phone being grabbed by someone with state-actor-level skills being after me is non-existent, and there are easier ways to get the same data from me.

As someone who's used android literally since the first android phone was released, it's a massive disappointment how locked down and enshittified it's become.

I am surprised it took you this long.

The next step in this evolutionary thinking is simple. Buying hardware specs is a fool's folly. I don't compare hardware. Ads and marketing are totally nonsense and not worth even a slight glance. The ONLY thing that matters is what open source projects exist and what hardware do they support well. This is how I shop. Open Source or F.O.

/e/os?

All in all my conclusion after experiencing the same: Samsung wants to replicate the same level of surveilance Google has. So with a Samsung phone I need to degoogle AND to desamsung ...

I used to use Lineage OS before without gapps and it worked flawlessly although it was few years ago. Give it a try.

That's only as long as you have money for a Pixel (and most people don't).

to respond to the title, I'm not sure about that. your problems are with the samsung system, not with all the custom roms. I think it's not only graphene that's the solution. It's even only available for a little subset of the phones.

This is why I specifically pick phones that have custom ROM support. Then I don't need to install gapps and I just use fdroid

How did you install it on a Samsung device?

Android Auto has a setting toggle to turn it on. "Unknown" apps or some bullshit.

I personally use GraphineOS on my phone and Alpine on my laptop

I've always used Samsung phones but I'm not buying anymore.

You can't really expect to have any privacy if you're using any online service anymore, so I just stopped trying. Blasting a Samsung phone with all the features enabled and not thinking of going back really.