top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 68 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Does this mean a rise in single player and couch-coop games? 🤩

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago*

    ... Yeah, about that.

    The vast majority of the industry kind of... forgot... how to do that.

    Also basically every big name single player game requires an online account to work.

    I'd would not expect either of those things to change.

    Maybe Australian kids can learn how to emulate retro games?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago (23 children)

    are you under 16

    no

    ok cool here's a youtube short when an AI voice tells you an AI-written story over vaguely related stock footage

    The planet is fucking melting and elected leaders are writing laws on herding cats

    I've been using the internet for longer than I've been an adult.

    I still sometimes add +10 years to date of birth fields out of habit.

    Might as well have issued a mandate to nom a spoonful of sand daily.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • load more comments (22 replies)
    [–] 46 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Of course one could also make the effort and instead force these platforms to provide actually useful parental supervision,guidance and parental information. But a blanked bann of course is far easier and much more catchy.

    So the 14 year old that moved overseas/away can no longer legally play a game free for 6year and above in a private lobby. Neither can a 12 year old play with his divorced dad living out of state,even when they play a coop without any interaction with third parties.

    All educational resources on YouTube? No longer available. Renowned youth programs from outside Australia? No longer available.

    Even parents who let their kids use responsible to make sure they slowly adapt to social media are now criminalised. Getting your 13 year old a Facebook accounts have full control of so it can be member in two closed groups (local clubs) and chat with relatives? Nope,not possible.

    Technically even using WhatsApp or Matrix can fall under this ban,btw.

    Because it's wording is so bad.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    1. The sole or primary purpose of the service is to enable online social interaction between two or more end users;
    2. The service allows end users to link to, or interact with, some or all of the other end users;

    The first two rules basically just mean no one can interact. A version of YouTube could exist within these rules.

    1. The service allows end users to post material on the service.

    So that's basically the Internet. You can't visit Rotten Tomatoes for film reviews. Maybe you only show the critics score. But aren't they also end users? How about a newspaper? Newspaper has an opinion section. How many opinion writers can you have?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    All children must now be locked alone in a windowless room and fed via robot until the age of 16 for their own safety. /s if that isn't obvious. But seriously I thought US conservitives were draconian.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Back to LAN parties? Because those were pretty fun to be honest...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    In a city, maybe, though some Australians live on pretty remote farms. Going to be hard to set up a LAN with your buddies down the street.

    kagis for discussion

    https://flemmingbojensen.com/2007/08/07/the-australian-outback/

    Stations (Australian for a ranch/farm) in the Outback are absolutely huge and the nearest neighbor is usually hundreds of kilometers away. People stay in touch through satellite phones, internet, cb radio and kids get their education long distance through the brilliant School of the Air.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Even this should be pretty easy — just connect directly (easy on IPv6) or through whatever tunnel you need depending on the game. Tailscale comes to mind, but you could do L2 tunneling with OpenVPN if you need to simulate an actual LAN.

    I don’t understand why you’d need a central server at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This will never work. YouTube is a part of education now.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Maybe that explains democracy falling apart everywhere

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What you say is true, but also ignores the alt-right pipelining that YouTube and others are seemingly complicit in, or at the very least is the result of perverse incentives.

    And I'll say the exact same thing about TikTok. It's serving as primary sources for many problems around the world, it's giving more broad and informed, collegiate level discussions of the world, and it's full of brainrotting limbic hijacking. All true and I don't think any generation is fully equipped to deal it.

    We can also see historically that banning a "vice" has never effectively removed the vice from society.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] [S] 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (14 children)

    watch this space, australia is the testing ground for new services overseas. If this rolls out effectively in Australia, you can expect it in your own country soon.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    This kills the crab.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    To the "can't enforce this because it can be circumvented" argument - this is missing the point of most laws. The intention is to apply to the majority, not to be foolproof. Getting most to stop a harmful behavior already gets us most of the benefits. We can never stop everyone.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Nanny State. Been saying it.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago
    [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›