this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
369 points (96.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3505 readers
668 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

4 years? Try 6 months from now.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It will just be renamed to No America Treaty Organization

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Technically not... They'd still have Canada.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Expecting the US to not maintain its monopoly on the demonym "American" is the same thing as expecting dogs not to bark at the mailman. Other western hemisphere countries shouldn't have dragged ass becoming independent.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

Don’t you dare call us American! Next thing you know we’ll stop apologizing for everything and actually build a military with jets instead of snowmobiles!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

The biggest thing will be all those nato countries who can't do anything with their US weapons if the US says so.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That is only if they want to continue to buy new weapons, not if they intend to male weapons in Europe

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No. I mean the weapons they have now. F35 for example. If a war happens in Europe, will those planes be useful without US support and authorizations? US can do a lot of harm to Europe with that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yes let me explain my answer I didn't elaborate properly.

I think the only recourse the US has if European countries use these weapons without authorization is that the US will not sell more weapons.

And if Europe continues to intreases it's weapon and ammunition production like they have the last two years that might not be a deal breaker for Europe

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 7 hours ago (7 children)

Thank fuck we didn’t give up our nukes in the UK.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

It seems like a very real possibility. A new, EU followup seems like a natural next step to protect the borders and peace.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Next stage of russian ops will focus more heavily on splitting Europe now that UK and US have been severed off

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago

It's death by a thousand cuts and nobody seems to care. Smh

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Straight out of Alexander Dugins book...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

thanks! I couldn’t reminder who wrote it.

Foundations of Geopolitics

And later

The Fourth Political Theory

He even used the term ‘special military operation’ in 1997…

His plan is certainly being implemented by putin

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›