this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
128 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19100 readers
4286 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's literally the process to create a dictator with one party rule and insert religion into government. Of course they are there. It was always the plan.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

Yup. Trump is their Trojan horse into the presidency. They don't give an actual fuck about Trump its all about project 2025 and foreign funding into turning the US into a dictatorship.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What’s worse is that if Trump wins, it’s going to be President JD Vance. People with advanced dementia decline fast once they get to a certain point and Trump is already deteriorating. He wouldn't last a year in office and then it’s going to become a couch-fucker dictatorship.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The oval office after JD takes the presidency:

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Feature, not bug.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Exactly. This is who the GOP are, and this is their agenda. They are filled with freaks and weirdos and perverts who are completely obsessed with ruling over others and they absolutely hate everything about what America is supposed to stand for and our rule of law.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I like that they are going to do/are doing ad campaigns on porn sites when viewing from swing states about how the freaks and the weirdos in the Republican Party (the GOP is Project 2025 and Project 2025 is the GOP - no real difference) plan on taking away your porn...that should reach at least a few low-info voters, I hope.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I hope political ad designer are smart enough to tie this into women's issues as well.

When men have no outlet for sexual gratification, what do you think will happen to the number of sexual assault instances?

(I'll nip this in the bud and say it's not to say EVERY guy will be a rape machine... I haven't had sex in 3 years and a real relationship in 10. I'm not raping anyone.)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Don't worry, according to undecided/centrists, it is all metaphorical and the news is just fear mongering. Trump wouldn't ACTUALLY do what he said he will.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I was surprised to see Ben Carson's picture.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago

New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New York Times:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/10/22/us/politics/project-2025-trump-heritage-foundation.html?unlocked_article_code=1.UE4.z0nq.9DKkhkg3J0UM
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support