Looks like they have valid reasons for doing this - also, remember: they still allow selfhosting. It's less about what they want to do, and more about 'people are shit, as usual, and this is why we can't have nice things'.
this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
12 readers
1 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!
founded 2 years ago
Looks like they have valid reasons for doing this
Yea, the company does not want to be an accessory for crime or illegal activity. That's to be expected if they want to keep their business running. But that won't stop people from raging and claiming the project is now going to die.
It may be reasonable for them, but for the people using it this kind of sucks. I'm one of the latter so as far as I'm concerned, this is a bad thing.
If you rely on a single service this much you should either pay for it or selfhost.
Edit: What I wrote might sound aggressive but I don't mean it in a bad way. I understand your concern, just wanted to point out that one should be ready for free (or any for that matter) services completely changing direction, conditions, or getting decommissioned.
Honestly, fair enough. The fact that you can self-host is huge imo, which no one else provides and ensures complete control, unlike Zoom where they sell your information to AI companies.
The benefit of jitsi was how easy it was to just go to a link and get a videocall going. No account or software needed. It's no longer useful to me if I need to log in, because I don't have facebook or google accounts and I don't feel like fiddling around with 2FA bullshit to log in with github. I can't even log in to github at all on my phone for some reason.
Whereby is pretty good. The host needs an account but all the participants can just visit a link, no account or application needed.
Criminals ruin everything.
Remember the good old times where OpenID / OAuth were starting to become the norm, and you could log in with StatusNet? Well why can't Jitsi do the same with my Mastodon account?
What did happen with OpenID, anyway? I remember it being big when Livejournal was a thing.
the biggest problem, ironically, was how flexible it was.
users were forgetting WHICH provider they signed up to a service with, causing a support nightmare and multiple accounts
then there was the issue that all the big players didn't accept external auth - so google, etc.. require their own accounts.
this is really good to know, thanks for sharing
If you are looking for Microsoft Office, Excel, PowerPoint, or Outlook for your laptop/PC then this Link is for you.
Download Link: Microsoft Official Link
If you don't believe, you can see our review and buy: "Review Chick Hare"
So sad