this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
362 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19047 readers
4008 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 23 hours ago

Flynn, should forced back into active duty, stripped of rank, all benefits yanked, court martialed and thrown into Ft. Leavenworth. The mother fucker is a traitor and take Bannon too.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Any of you anti-gun people have second thoughts hearing shit like this?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm mostly in favor of gun ownership, but unless I'm allowed to own RPGs, bombs, and other similar equipment then I'm not going to be able to do much against the military with it. Gun ownership is for self-defense, not fighting the military like so many right wing nuts dream about. The only real option if fighting the military happens is aid from outside or taking the military's equipment. Both of these do not require prior ownership of weapons. Alternatively, knowledge of bomb making would be another tool, and does not require prior ownership, though this knowledge is controlled already and not defended by typical gun-rights organizations.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Everyone looks at extremes.

Yeah, a populace armed with AR-15s and Glocks can't fight bombers, but when a government reaches the point where bombers are being used against the population you'll also have a military split, so there will be heavy equipment on both sides.

Imagine something smaller in scale, like if the governor of Texas decided to start execution of liberals while Trump was President. Trump probably wouldn't directly take part, but also wouldn't send in the military to stop the governor.

That's where small arms for civilians becomes relevant.

They're also relevant because they're distributed. With 100 million+ armed households, there's no safe way to be a tyrant.

Trump was almost killed by 1 person who planned poorly. If there were millions of armed people moved to that level of violence it would be impossible to govern without committing the kind of atrocity that would cause a military split/coup.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The gun people are expecting the guns to be pointed at the libs. They're all for it.

They are absolutely clueless that any dictator strips guns from people because they can't bear any threat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

I am gun people....I'm not point my shit at Americans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

If you haven't been targeted by the police for running your mouth at them then who are you lecturing exactly ?

Why are you attacking your allies ? Not everyone should have a fucking gun, mate.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The US is spending $1.7T over the next thirty years to completely overhaul its nuclear arsenal.

But don't worry, I've got a Beretta in my holster and a shotgun under the bed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You forget about Vietnam? Isis is also kicking around still too which you have to know about seeing how recent that one was.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

It's not worth the argument. They won't understand.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago

Flynn should reinstated, stripped of rank, court martialed and thrown into Ft. Leavenworth. He is a traitor and a POS.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

I’m about winning. We have to win. And these people are already up to no good. So, we gotta win first. We win, and then, “Katy, bar the door.” OK? Believe me: The gates of hell — my hell — will be unleashed.

As my MSNBC colleague Steve Benen just explained, Trump is now openly floating the idea of deploying the military against his critics if he’s elected. It’s easy to imagine Flynn being part of that violent plan.

The guy who was all-in on Qanon, who had his family take whatever stupid pledge on video, who asked why we couldn't "do that here" when Myanmar's army stole their government, wants to be in charge. Frightening stuff.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

During his first term he just cracked the gates of hell open a little and we had sky-rocketing national debt and over a million covid deaths. Next time he will fling them wide open guaranteeing chaos and the deaths of millions. Listen to him. Believe him on this.
Putin must be giddy that his plan for the destruction of the U.S. might come together.

[–] [email protected] 124 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Michael Flynn, the convicted felon and russian asset? That Michael Flynn?

[–] [email protected] 105 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I have a picture of him right here if anyone forgot who he was. Probably just a coincidence Jill Stein is also in this photo.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago

I always thought this photo reminded me of the café scene in Inglorious Basterds.

A veritable who's who of real life horror.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

He is spewing this bile and still being paid with US tax dollars. America is dead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly it baffles me how he’s not been charged with something that puts him away for a long damn time. He’s like, overtly traitorous. It’s not ambiguous. It’s not a grey area.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What I mean is that he’s continued to do traitorous shit since being pardoned.

Also, the “fuck you, official act” defense is now a thing, so Biden could totally just personally off him, since he’s very clearly a domestic enemy, and defending the republic enemies foreign and domestic is literally in the oath of office.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can we just stop with the "Democrats should just murder Republicans since the SC said Trump can do it" bullshit.

If you disagree with it, why the fuck are you guys constantly trying to further legitimize it?

Stop acting like once we do that it's just going to be smooth sailing instead of a giant cesspool of global instability.

The meme is dead. It's done.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Malicious compliance needs to be used FAR more often in the context of how deeply corrupt and blatantly partisan the Supreme Court has become. That’s the underlying gist of my point.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Why not also 6/9th of the court

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Heaven and hell needing gates is worrying. I suspect their purpose is containment.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

“What your sentiment is about is accountability,” said Flynn, adding that the Founding Fathers had a similar priority.

“I definitely believe we need accountability,” he said.

“Your question went into some other areas,” Flynn added with a laugh, before concluding: “I think a lot of people actually think like you do, and I think that that’s your right and our privilege. ... There’s a way to get after this, but we have to win first.”

Uh oh....

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

George Washington would shoot Flynn in the face.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Theodore Roosevelt would rip off his arms and beat him to death with them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

After trampling Trump with a moose.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I have no doubt. Let’s keep those gates closed.

Vote Gates Of Hell 2024.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

not happening

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That we have to worry about the xtian taliban getting power via dementia donnie....in 2024.

We are talking about terrorism here. Why do all these old fucks want life to be miserable for everyone else? Is it because they think they are at the end of of their lives?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Suffering is a core part of the conservative philosophy. Conservatives despise the idea that life can be easier, despite other countries showing us how to do these things.

Affordable higher education, universal healthcare, gun control, robust social safety nets, worker protections... of 31 developed nations, only the U.S. lacks these things. This is 100% because of conservatives.

Nothing good in the history of mankind has ever come from conservatism. Nothing at all. It is a plague of misery, oppression and death that is long overdue for a cure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

Republicans remind me of the Krohn's disease med Skyrizi. "Control means everything to me"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

Suffering is a core part of the conservative philosophy. Conservatives despise the idea that life can be easier, despite other countries showing us how to do these things.

Suffering for those they disagree with. Hard lives for those they dislike, while conservatives pay lip service to their hardships and buy off their problems with indulgences.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

It's 100% because of thevery wealthy owning all three branches of government.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

No, it's because they've been miserable their entire lives despite having the world handed to them on a gold-colored platter.

load more comments
view more: next ›