this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
97 points (99.0% liked)

Legal News

231 readers
18 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Uber's US terms of service, which they accepted, mean disputes have to be settled out of court.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You can always sue. Also, negligence can always change a service agreement.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

They already took it to the state Supreme Court and got shut down.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yep, just have to find the right angle, the right plaintiff.

Maybe take the driver's insurance company on a civil complaint, then they'll be motivated to get compensation from Uber.

This could be an interesting turn in all of this.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Do we need to make an amendment that bans arbitration clauses?

I don't see how a click, to use a service, can subsume a constitutional right.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Smells like Disney