top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 2 years ago (8 children)

In case you missed the markings on it, it’s also free and runs on electricity, which in France is low carbon.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    And it's a shuttle, not a line bus, tbf

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    And the distinction is pointless. It's a bus. It is. It simply is a bus. Some kind of bus.

    Bus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Shuttles tend to be free of charge more often than buses, for various reasons. This shuttle being gratis does not imply that any other buses in the area are free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Why should the name of the vehicle type depend on whether some governments have a tendency to make them free? It's still a bus. A small bus. A shuttle and a bus. Perchance a shuttle bus. Or just either. But definitely both.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    The opposite is true for the US. Because of the abhorrently large firetrucks you can't have smaller roads.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Also because everything in the US is spread out except for urban areas, mass transit just won't work well for a large part of the population. Didn't help that what transit infrastructure existed came under assault by the oil/car companies of the time, so many places went full automobile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    The abhorrently large firetrucks which increase the response times before they can get out to fires, because things are more spread out. The abhorrently large firetrucks which siphon away more and more funding, compared to smaller firetrucks, and require more manpower to operate, meaning each fire station individually eats up more funding per unit, meaning we can have less fire stations, further decreasing response times.

    An increase in response times which increases the size of fires, requiring more and more abhorrently large firetrucks. The abhorrently large firetrucks which cannot respond quickly enough to wildfires and so will allow them to grow more rapidly out of control, perpetuating more wildfire based ecology, more plants which require fire to grow and will encourage further fire. The abhorrently large firetrucks which are not as cute as small firetrucks.

    Those firetrucks? Those are the ones we have to build bigger roads for? some people do legitimately believe this shit, too, hoo lee, kill me

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    interesting thing about fire trucks… i asked a fire fighter friend from the US if he knew why their trucks were different to everywhere else in the world, and apparently it’s because US infrastructure is built for military use… if elsewhere in the world had the heavy duty roads, we might also have the heavier fire trucks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    I have a hard time believeing this. The not just bike video adresses that tangentially. Non US fire trucks use commercial chassis and are cheaper, carry the same equipment and can fit into urban areas easier. It just seems to be a cultural thing. Truck big!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago

    That’s a super cute little bus.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    No medieval city claims that. Hell, they are more walkable and transit oriented than more modern cities that were designed for cars. Stop with the straw men.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    No medieval city claims that.

    Its a common enough argument in the UK. I've even seen a few instances in which bus stops have been taken down because people were complaining about the traffic they created (small street with no passing lane, so when the bus stops, the dozen cars behind it are bottled up).

    None of the busybodies trying to sabotage the local transit system seems to want to recognize the twelve cars behind the bus as the problem, of course.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    None of the busybodies trying to sabotage the local transit system seems to want to recognize the twelve cars behind the bus as the problem, of course.

    I feel like I perhaps know who may be driving those cars

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Saying they don’t like the location of a bus stop is not saying you can’t have busses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    It's also not true. Don't know any towns in the UK that don't have buses and use small streets as an excuse.

    Most of the towns in the UK that don't have buses use lack of funding from central government as an excuse, which is a pretty good excuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    It's not the medieval cities that fight tooth and nail to prevent public transit.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Here in my town, they simply have a refurbished van with like 12 seats hauling people around.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    If you don't have room for busses now, when will you have room for all the parking required for everyone to drive a car around all the time?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago*

    Bluebus 22: 5,460 m (17.9 ft)

    Dodge Ram: 6,340 m (20.8 ft)

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Aix-en-Provence: Hold my rosé

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    "Hold my mustard" made me smile :D

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    How many people can sit in that little thing?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They don't need to sit that many. It's not an interstate route that runs thrice a day and carries 300 people in each run. For it to be an alternative to cars you need to have lots of route and they need to be quite frequent - which means less people in each minibus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago
    [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    "Fuck cars ... but not this car."

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    They have the same problem in Siena, Italy.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I feel like the top statement is a -

    Said no-one ever

  • source
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    What is this? A bus for ants?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›