▲ 693 ▼ Fuck Cars. (feddit.org) submitted 2 years ago by 101@feddit.org to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works 52 comments fedilink hide all child comments Mastodon.
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) And the distinction is pointless. It's a bus. It is. It simply is a bus. Some kind of bus. Bus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) Shuttles tend to be free of charge more often than buses, for various reasons. This shuttle being gratis does not imply that any other buses in the area are free. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Why should the name of the vehicle type depend on whether some governments have a tendency to make them free? It's still a bus. A small bus. A shuttle and a bus. Perchance a shuttle bus. Or just either. But definitely both. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Damage@feddit.it 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Dude, it's not a matter of vehicle type, even trains can be shuttles. It just means that its purpose is to bring people from one point to another without stops, usually from some transportation hub. It's a shuttle because IT'S WRITTEN ON ITS SIDE. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago And it's a bus. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) Shuttles tend to be free of charge more often than buses, for various reasons. This shuttle being gratis does not imply that any other buses in the area are free. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Why should the name of the vehicle type depend on whether some governments have a tendency to make them free? It's still a bus. A small bus. A shuttle and a bus. Perchance a shuttle bus. Or just either. But definitely both. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Damage@feddit.it 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Dude, it's not a matter of vehicle type, even trains can be shuttles. It just means that its purpose is to bring people from one point to another without stops, usually from some transportation hub. It's a shuttle because IT'S WRITTEN ON ITS SIDE. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago And it's a bus. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Why should the name of the vehicle type depend on whether some governments have a tendency to make them free? It's still a bus. A small bus. A shuttle and a bus. Perchance a shuttle bus. Or just either. But definitely both. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Damage@feddit.it 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Dude, it's not a matter of vehicle type, even trains can be shuttles. It just means that its purpose is to bring people from one point to another without stops, usually from some transportation hub. It's a shuttle because IT'S WRITTEN ON ITS SIDE. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago And it's a bus. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Dude, it's not a matter of vehicle type, even trains can be shuttles. It just means that its purpose is to bring people from one point to another without stops, usually from some transportation hub. It's a shuttle because IT'S WRITTEN ON ITS SIDE. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago And it's a bus. permalink fedilink source parent