This is the best summary I could come up with:
Charities sell your data to telemarketers, unless they take loose money you should avoid at all costs.
I'm not a bot.
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)
Australia
3648 readers
33 users here now
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
Before you post:
If you're posting anything related to:
- The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
- Politics, post it to Australian Politics
- World News/Events, post it to World News
- A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
- When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment
Banner Photo
Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Australian Politics
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
- Aussie Memes
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
Moderation
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The aggressive sales tactics of the charity representatives at those little pop-ups at the supermarket and plazas are a bit shady as well, IMO. I usually manage to avoid them but the few times I have been stopped, it's never a pleasant/easy experience to get away. They are trained to sell this way, and I understand they need the donations, but it never leaves me with a feeling of respect for the charity they represent.
I cant afford to make monthly donations but sometimes I would like the option to drop a cash donation in a tin, or to make a one-off merch purchase. Unfortunately neither of these things are ever an option these days, so instead we get the hard sell and are left with a bad taste in the mouth.
100%, $70 a month to restore sight? Homie I'm struggling to afford to eat and pay rent.
In fact if I was even $10,000 better off a year in my job id absolutely be dishing it out to those who need it. But hell no you can't have my data.
Read the article again maybe? Not what is happening here. Maybe a bot would would have been more accurate?
I know what I'm saying, give a cent to these charities and your phone will be ringing every dinner time by Indian telemarketers. It's a pretty well known fact at the moment.
They take your money and sell your data.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The Cancer Council, Canteen and Fred Hollows Foundation have confirmed donor information has been published on the dark web.
"Under the Australian Privacy Principles, there is a requirement for personal information data to be destroyed or de-identified once it is no longer needed for the purpose for which it was collected.
"We're deeply upset that our supporters have been impacted by a data breach at Pareto Phone … we understand that this will cause major concern for kind-hearted people who donate."
"We understand that this may be a concerning situation for anyone who has generously donated to Cancer Council, and we unreservedly apologise for any distress caused," a statement read.
"We have not at this stage identified any identity documents such as tax file numbers, driver licenses and passports about any donor," Mr Smedley said.
There is a risk more data could be published, since there had been four months between the attack and the leak, Paul Haskell-Dowland, a professor of Cybersecurity Practice at Edith Cowan University, said.
The original article contains 653 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!