top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 128 points 2 years ago (9 children)

POV: Every triangle is a love triangle if you really love triangles

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Youre using POV in the wrongest way to hang a lantern on it and Im here for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Accute Love Triangle: Two people who are boning, but they wistfully pine for a third person from afar.

    Obtuse Love Triangle: Two people pinning for the same third, when they'd be better off hooking up with each other.

    Equilateral Love Triangle: When there is no age-gap discourse in the polycule.

    Right Love Triangle: When the odd-couple finds the perfect person to square them off.

    Stereographically Projected Love Triangle: A romantic Isekai

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    The classic love triangle was with Arthur, Lancelot, and Guinevere, where both guys wanted the girl but were also best friends. Does that not qualify?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    Technically the triangle just refers to 'relationships' and not 'romantic relationships' so two male friends and one female love interest works as a triangle but one woman with two male strangers doesn't with because that's just a V.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 63 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    ❌ Love triangle

    ✅ Lust pentagram

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Hmm, you could have a Mulan situation with one of the pairings 🤔

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Where the dude is into effiminate guys, or ...?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    The dude went to a drag queen show without understanding what the whole concept was

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Gotcha. That accounts for one pairing. What about the other two? You'd need at least a double mulan situation in order to have a chance at an actually straight love triangle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    A = straight man who performs in drag shows, interested in B B = straight woman, interested in C C = straight man who doesn't know what a drag queen is and thinks they're women (a genderswapped Mulan situation), interested in A's drag persona

    I have no idea if this is what python actually meant by "a Mulan situation" but now this feels like I'm trying to solve a sudoku or something

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Huh. That'll do it. What about a triangle where each person has to decide between the other two (as in Hollywood where the girl is trying to choose between two guys, but with an actual triangle as noted in the image), but still remains straight?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    There's some Interesting graph theory problem somewhere in here about finding out if a network of N people in M relationships must include at least one gay person.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

    A relationship graph which requires no gay relationships is called a bigraph (honest, I'm not making this up) or bipartite.

    That follows because if you can two color the graph so that edges only connect different colors, you just assign male to one color and female to the other.

    This means there's a tone of mathematical identities describing this. Wikipedia has a good introduction.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipartite_graph

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Very neat. But the fun part of this is that if you're poly/into more than one person, you are now a part of the LGBT group, not the straight one.

    Note the above image, where the triangle shape requires that every person be into another person, with the tension being that if it's cishet, they have to choose only one person.

    We aren't checking to see if a shape with LGBT people works, we know those do. We are checking to see if a cishet triangle is even possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 years ago

    Even numbers are pretty easy to solve at least. They can be straight or lgbt.

    I posit that any love shape that includes an odd number of participants requires some form of deception, or at least one LGBT person in order to be valid.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Is it a triangle if one of the sides is not straight though?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If all the sides are curved, it's a love circle

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Kalodin, Adolin, and Shalan (spelling is probably wrong, audiobooks of fantasy series) in the storm light archive are the greatest love triangle because each arrow is bidirectional

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    I remember when I was a young lad seeing a magazine about some drama or another involving a 'love triangle', and, confused, asking my mother if one of the members of the triangle was gay, since I couldn't conceive how a love triangle could work otherwise.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    If the love triangle in question does not have the potential for a threesome, it is not a triangle.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Wait this is great! I love my wife but she doesn't love me back! So all we need to do is find a person who she loves that then loves me so we can have threesomes!

    Oh can't wait! I wonder 🤔 who this person will be!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Ouu. Spicy take (though I agree). Post it on !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world and get banned in one easy step

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Those sides should be bidirectional

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago
    [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    If we're just talking math, triangles can be defined in terms of 3-element subsets of all 3 (A)ngles and 3 (S)ides:
    SSS - unique
    SAS - unique
    ASS - may be unique depending on the lengths of the sides
    ASA - unique
    SAA - unique
    AAA - infinite solutions

    Maybe someone cleverer than me can figure out how that maps on to love and gender.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    ...which instance is accidentalpolyamory on

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›