all 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 33 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I have a ticket stub in my basement from when I saw Nine Inch Nails and A Perfect Circle for $40, so I definitely remember. I went to a ton of concert when I was younger making a fraction of what I make now.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    That concert was in 2000, so in today's money that $40 would be around $72.

    In 2022 I saw NIN in Cleveland and got GA tickets for $48 each (including fees).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Keep in mind NIN in 2022 doesn't have the leading act draw they had in 2000, and that isn't the same as say 1990.

    We need metrics that include their popularity/ticket sales, etc.

    I paid $100 a ticket in 1985 for a stadium sellout band at the time. Ten years before my older siblings paid $40 for the same band.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Support your local music scene! I mean like bars, cafes, clubs, outdoors, even restaurants can have local or regional groups playing in all kinds of styles and they're often pretty good. You can be feet away from the band and talk to them afterwards if you want, and the cost is minimal.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Video is talking about exactly such a local scene and how it's being killed right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    No, from the transcript it looks like they're talking about mid-sized venues (they give an example of a 400-person venue), I'm talking smaller than that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    Oh you think I forgot what it was like in my teens. I just don’t go to shows anymore.

  • source
  • [+] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (14 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I keep saying things like this on lemmy and catching hate.

    "Video games companies are fucking us!"

    "Have you considered not buying their games?"

    "FUCK YOOOUUUU!"

    If I have a non-essential product, I'm selling it for every penny I can wrench out of the public (idiots). Hell, even with food you got options. I'm on the edge of a little redneck suburb and have 7 grocery stores within 10-miles. I vote with my wallet at the rundown places that are half the price of Publix. I won't begrudge Publix's ludicrous pricing, I just won't go.

    Hey guys: If you are paying for this shit, you are the problem, not the system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I was going to say that stopping buying tickets obviously won't prevent them from going up even if it does temporarily but then you said it yourself in the last paragraph. You can't take away monopoly power without government action.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    these kind of boycotts have never really worked to impact lasting change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    They don't work because concert tickets are still under valued. If an artist can sell out a 9,000 person venue at $20 a seat, and then they find out they can still sell out the same venue charging $200 a seat - just to a different crowd, then they are going to go with the $200 option.

    I love going to concerts and now that I'm older I mostly avoid General Admission tickets, so I'm already paying more. This year I've gone to 6 concerts and on average I've paid around $120 per ticket. While expensive, I've never felt like what I paid wasn't worth it. But, when it comes to beer/water/food I always feel that it's over priced and not worth the cost. Don't get me started on the employee asking for a 20% tip on a $20 beer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Watch the video. Neither the artist nor the venue have any real say on the matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Artists absolutely do have a say on the matter, they can say no. They can not tour. They can only do small venues that don't use Live Nation. They can use other ticketing services - although the most expensive concert I went to this year was Rolling Stones and they didn't use Ticketmaster.

    Artists choose to go with Live Nation because it makes them money, provides a better ticketing experience for their fans, and gives the artist a boogeyman to blame for high ticket costs. Pearl Jam tried to fight this fight in the 90s and realized that there isn't a better alternative if they wanted to tour and make money. They chose to keep touring and went back to using Ticketmaster.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    People who can't afford it are already not going. That's why their CEOs are comparing concerts to luxury handbags.

    You're still appealing to emotion of those who can afford it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    I don't have the ability to listen to a video right now to engage with the points this video specifically makes, but I will share something I just recently learnt that may alleviate some of the blame from Ticketmaster for concerts becoming expensive.

    There's been a complete flip in the music industry. It used to be that record sales were the primary means of musicians getting income, and they would use concert tours as an advertisement for their records. But since digital downloads of singles, and even more since streaming, people listening to their music at home doesn't make much money for musicians anymore, except for from the small subset of hardcore fans who might be buying vinyl or other collectors' items. So instead they make money by touring and selling merch (which itself is often associated with a tour). Which naturally means prices need to rise.

    None of this absolves Ticketmaster for its role in dishonestly raising the prices through the use of extra mandatory fees. The advertised price should be the minimum price you can actually pay, inclusive of all required components.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    I asked my friend who was heavily involved in the funk scene in the 60s/70s (touring with Funkadelic and Chaka Khan) and he calls bullshit on that claim. Unless you're your own label or can sell millions of em, record sales ain't shit. It's all about the concerts and merch.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Unless you’re at the top, touring and merch have always been the money-makers. Can you provide evidence of this flip? Speaking from 20+ yr in DIY music, I’ve never known a band who wasn’t in big box stores to make anything approaching stable money off records and the bands I know in big box stores aren’t big enough to make much at all off 10% to 20% of a low volume of sales. Bands that are big enough to sell out a stadium are above my scope so I can only guess, say, Metallica made enough off record sales to do dumb shit like sue Napster.

    On the backend I have yet to see a valid reason other than greed for a ticket servicer or artist to gouge prices as high as they go. Ticketmaster has openly talked about how they happily hide higher prices behind service fees for artists too afraid to openly gouge and secretly colludes with artists.

    I don’t have the ability to listen to a video right now

    This is the same as reading a clickbait headline and going off in the wrong direction. Your point is contradicted in the summary of the video and skimming the summary highlights all the things you would need to know.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago*

    What you're talking about happened way before the Ticketmaster-Live Nation monopoly became a thing. Today if you want to make a medium to large concert you have no choice most of the time but to use a Live Nation venue and Ticketmaster for tickets. For example Live Nation owns all large concert venues in Toronto and I recently learned they've purchased the well known smaller venues over the last few years. They're now in a position to extract more value from fans and performers. Similar to how large grocery chains can extract from both customers and suppliers.

    You should see the video though. It explains things well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Concerts used to be loss leaders to drive album sales

    With albums sales down the concert has become the product and ticket master's business model is to be the only game in town and wring out as much money from concert goers as possible

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I know, I was there.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I think a part of the reason concerts are so expensive is big acts tour with an army of performers and stage hands to ensure the music sounds exactly like the recording. That's what the audience has come to expect.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    There really needs to be an anti-trust lawsuit against ticketmaster

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago