Being a lib is so easy, you can just say anything and if it's wrong, just bring up "Tianmen" square.
i dont think there's any value in continuing to communicate with that person. but if you must i would just tell him if he want's to talk about china he's more than welcome to fuck off and find someone else who wants to argue about it with him. you don't have to defend any point you're not making, and if you try they'll just bring up some other bullshit gotcha they can use to justify to themselves that you're still somehow wrong despite being factually correct.
There's really no value in continuing to communicate with anyone. Anyone reachable has already found their way here on their own.
You don't convince people of anything with one internet argument. Still, I think it's worth it to try and state and defend your beliefs publicly. It may or may not sway anyone but it does at least force you to examine and understand your beliefs so that you can competently defend them.
Tianmen
HOLY SHIT WE'RE DEALING WITH AN EXPERT FOLKS
Imagine only knowing (incorrect stuff) about two things, and you can't even spell one of them.
US is not NATO. Sheesh.
I hate when libs pretend this is true
Sheesh.
Less common but still distinct redditism there. 
I say sheesh and fiddlesticks. I am ready to die on this hill.
US wars are either an exclusively US thing or a NATO joint operation depending on which one carries more water for imperialism in the current context.
Whataboutism is only when the communists do it. When I do it, I'm a free-thinker. /s
They honestly are more of bots than any putin/xi bot wishes it ever could be
Its a litmus test, now answer please.
Edit: Busted!
@[email protected] coming in with the receipts. Fuck that lib.
I guess "whataboutism" is ok when they do it.
im pretty sure they only throw out whataboutism when you try and draw parallels between what america does and what the state department is trying to get people outraged at.
they never use it to point out when someone is changing the subject after they've failed to defend one of their arguments.
True.
Tinyman square
Average lib: 
Side note, good work combatting liberalism! I see you do it all the time 
Thanks ❤️
Lmao that’s when you know you’ve won the argument. Liberals talk a big game about being logical but always resort to sick burns and downvotes when they can no longer argue in good faith.
"My take is the same as this conservative newspaper and CBS news' eyewitness, and the BBC's eyewitness. As for the Uyghurs my take is the same as the official UN final assessment report."
I would drop this and tell them to F off.
I propose a game of bingo for these recurring liberal dog whistles: Tianmen Square, Uyghurs, Holodomor, North Korea, Do you condemn HAMAS?, etc.
If they hit BINGO by naming 5 or more, then they get a prize:
Door A
spoiler
Door B
spoiler
Door C
spoiler
Door D
spoiler
The Dredge Tank. For posting all the low tier reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else. Got some bullshit from Reddit with 2 upvotes and want to share, post it here.
This community was created with the purpose that Rule 8 fans will just block it.
The rules are literally The Dunk Tank's rules, just without rule 8.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.