this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
48 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1311 readers
345 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.

Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.

Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
48
DOJ claims Google has “trifecta of monopolies” on Day 1 of ad tech trial (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/22463369

Ad tech monopoly trial may hurt Google more than DOJ’s search case, experts say.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"With the cost of ads going down and the number of ads sold going up, the market is working," Google's blog said. "The DOJ’s case risks inefficiencies and higher prices—the last thing that America’s economy or our small businesses need right now."

So uh. Google. We need to talk. None of us likes this. Nobody likes this. We don’t want cheaper and more ads. We don’t like ads. We especially don’t like your firehose force-feeding of ads to us. Your argument here is “it’s good because it helps us make money”. We do not care that it’s your business model, because your business model is objectively annoying and harmful to society.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I swear, the rich are truly buying their own bullshit at this point. They seem to genuinely think that the peasants enjoy being fucked as hard as absolutely possible. They have made these arguments repeatedly about many horrible practices they do.

Finance leaders try to claim that frontrunning users purchases and banking the difference, is somehow beneficial to the customer.

They are all fucking deranged.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Break up the company already... Make them separate entities and introduce provisions to prevent them merging for a decade or more.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Good

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Honestly Google isn't the worst one. They do have alternatives

It feels weird to start blowing money on broad lawsuits. If you want to prosecute a particular action or decision go for it but "big tech bad" is not terribly productive. It very much feels like a political move more than a economic move.