this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
384 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

58180 readers
3674 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Many of the concessions the government asked of TikTok look eerily similar to the surveillance tactics critics have accused Chinese officials of abusing. To allay fears the short-form video app could be used as a Chinese surveillance tool, the federal government nearly transformed it into an American one instead.

lul The real motivation

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

This is why the US Government wants to ban Tiktok. It's very easy for them to force Google, Apple, Microsoft or Twitter to spy on people. It's much harder with a Chinese company that is headquartered overseas.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Let us see the data and analysis products you're gathering on our citizens to send home to the CCP"

"How dare you ask us for such an invasion of their privacy!"

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They forcefully got tons of data from google, microsoft etc on US citizens. Why would they be doing it for “good” now? Just because “CCP bad”?

Instead Apple and hardware manufacturers in general should prevent their products from allowing any software company from invading the people’s privacy in such intense ways.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This article and the one it links to from Forbes describe arrangements to access the data that is being collected through the app but I believe the Gizmodo headline is misrepresenting that as a request for additional invasive features. My comment is meant to point out how I perceive the drafted agreement and the pearl-clutching response from that headline.

I don't think they want that information purely in the service of Truth, Justice and the American Way™ but concerns about what the CCP has access to through their app are legitimate. Privacy invasion is unacceptable no matter who is doing it. There are cases where it is necessary but even then, it should be limited and subject to intense scrutiny to protect the rights of individuals. The Patriot act and things like it are an absolute disaster on that front, for example, but that's no excuse for feeding our information directly to a hostile foreign power.

I'd love to see hardware and software producers (as well as legislators) putting user privacy higher on their list of priorities. It's a huge problem that we're still coming to grips with and the people making the rules are generally woefully ignorant of the technology in use.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you,

People who read headlines are being robbed here. I agree following the Forbes article was WAY more helpful and nothing backed up Gizmodo's claim.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Instead Apple and hardware manufacturers in general should prevent their products from allowing any software company from invading the people’s privacy in such intense ways.

lol, every intel processor has a backdoor called the intel management engine, it's literally a second processor running minix.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Right? And who do you think asked them to put it in there?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (6 children)

When the US does it it's just established practise. When a non-US entity does the same thing, it's suddenly a matter of national security.

The anti-Chinese vibe in the US right now is rather absurd. The rise of China should have been viewed as an opportunity, not a threat.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

When the US does it it's just established practise. When a non-US entity does the same thing, it's suddenly a matter of national security.

Even as someone with a healthy distrust for the Chinese government, this really is the reason why. If Facebook was Chinese and nothing else changed, the US government would feel the same way.

TikTok is used as a surveillance tool in China but US social media is also used the same way here. I wouldn't be surprised if Facebook at the very least donated public profile pictures to the FBI for facial recognition purposes.

The US would react the same for almost any other government with exceptions to the Five Eyes, in which case they wouldn't care, and Russia, in which case it would be fully banned.

Not to claim that the US government and the Chinese government are the same, though. Only more or less from a spying and surveillance perspective.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When you see the amount of patriotism people seem to get flooded in from an early age, it's kinda understandable the blindness a lot of Americans have to how shitty their country has gotten.

On the flip side, China definitely has its own problems, particularly with such an authoritarian government currently.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

the blindness a lot of Americans have to how shitty their country has ~~gotten~~ always been.

FTFY (signed: a lemming from Latin America).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Any country, US or not, spying on other countries' citizens ought to be taken as a matter of national security in the target countries. China does take it as a matter of national security, which is why, among other reasons, many foreign social media sites and services are blocked, run as separate instances from the rest of the world, or restricted heavily

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

On the other hand, if all of this public attention leads to restrictions on ALL digital tracking, not just from foreign corporations, I'll be soo happy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Every accusation levelled at china is projection

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only issue I've ever had with TikTok is that it's the Chinese government spying on American citizens in a way they don't allow America to do to theirs. Not that either instance is right but you can't say something is wrong and not allowed and do it yourself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But America spies on non-American citizens in the exact same way as TikTok does. The US complaining here is just hypocrisy. And the US has been doing it for far longer than the Chinese have.

So as a European citizen there is no difference between USian or Chinese Big Tech in terms of spying on me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

China doesn't let anyone spy on their citizens as they ban all foreign social media etc. That's the difference.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

File it under "no shit" and "stuff that was called from the beginning but now we'll all act surprised."

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Every accusation is a confession rule

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Everything the Americans accuse China and Russia of, they are guilty of it themselves.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

So instead of doing their job and preventing US citizens to be spied on by foreign governments, they just want a piece of the cake and spy on them and others, too!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

The draft document, which Gizmodo could not independently verify, 

So they have no idea what is or isn't actually in this agreement, but sounds like they've asked for data access and audit capabilities to ensure US user data is separated and not sent where it shouldn't be.

This honestly seems reasonable. It's a foreign app from a country that has banned every American tech app, data is only flowing one way and that's concerning.

But honestly without knowing what's actually in there this article is pretty pointless. Just more unverified fearmongering clickbait.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you ever wondered why people are so eager to accept the premise that China is doing everything to spy on foreign nationals?

Considering that those claims are almost all getting started by American agencies, and given the details of the Snowden leaks... America is projecting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How unsurprising. There will be no consequences for the federal government, even if this information should become common knowledge.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Whoever is responsible for making it common knowledge will be hated by the people and branded a traitor. We've already seen this story play out before.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

well, there it is

Now we understand what the "National Security Threat" was all this time, not that it wasn't painfully obvious from the jump. Every other major social media platform is in bed with the Feds, giving them access to whatever they wish at a moment's notice. The "threat" to the nation isn't foreign influence it's domestic influence. If they can't have backend access to the system to monitor these domestic threats, then the whole system is a threat. If you are using TikTok as a means of ORGANIZING then you are a THREAT to the NATIONAL SECURITY because the Feds can't WATCH YOU LIKE A HAWK.

At one point, TikTok reportedly altered language that would have allowed government officials to demand changes to the apps recommendations algorithm if it promoted content the agencies disagreed with.

But but but... MUH FREEZ PEACH!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Too late... China already installed the foreign spying features first.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

It sounds like those same "spying features" — e.g. examining server logs — would also be useful as *counter-*spying features, to verify that TikTok is not being used as a weapon by the genocidal regime currently in power in China.

Given that the genocidal regime has engaged in illegal harassment, assault, and espionage against people of Chinese ethnicity residing in the US, Canada, and other nations, that seems like a pretty good idea, really! The US government has a legitimate interest in protecting its citizens of Chinese descent from lawless abuse by a foreign power.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh fuck off. They wanted it to spy on their own citizens and those of its allied nations. They wanted the same backdoor google, Facebook, Microsoft and all our telecom companies give them.

I've seen a lot of bad takes but this takes the cake. There isn't anything virtuous about mass spy programs and no way was any actual chinese data even on the table.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They wanted the same backdoor google, Facebook, Microsoft and all our telecom companies give them.

None of those companies give "backdoor access". All information has to be obtained legally via a warrant. Why do you think they're all throwing E2E encryption in their apps? Nobody wants to work with the government here, it's bad for business.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I suggest you read all about FISA courts.

They issue court orders which companies cannot divulge they're under and those things are often not limited to surveillance of specific individuals in the course of investigating a crime but are often mass surveillance orders.

This is how the NSA had servers directly in some US phone providers feeding directly from their core systems.

All this was brought out as part of the Snowden revelations, so you should know better than parrot the description of what has been a fantasy version of how the Law works in the US since 9/11 and the Patriot Act.

Still today it's a core rule for companies anywhere in the World which have trade secrets that might be of benefit to US companies to not use any systems hosted or owned by US companies (or, in fact, UK ones, were such laws are even worse) exactly because said US companies can silently be complied BY LAW to give the local spy agencies access to that data.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Given that the genocidal regime has engaged in illegal harassment, assault, and espionage

Yes, but enough about the US regime.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (11 children)

and Iraq had WMDs, right? right?

It amazes me how you keep believing the lies of the US government.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›