this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
74 points (95.1% liked)

196

16725 readers
2369 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A hand holding up a deck of cards, the first card is Indestructible Aura from Magic the Gathering

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Got my dad some old mtg cards on ebay for his 50th

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They should make tee shirts off this illustration

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is this official? It just looks too funny lol

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's official, and classic! The first few years, there were not really any guidelines; the artist was given the name of the card (and its color, I think) to illustrate, and that's it.

New players: "It doesn't grant Indestructible, and it's not an Aura!"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sometimes artists weren't even given the name of the card. The original art for enlightened mystic was supposed to be for another card entirely

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Ah, that's right. Sometimes the cards were adapted to fit the art afterwards. Ankh of Mishra was supposed to be Ark of Mishra (reillustrated as an ark in Fifth Edition) and Hyalopterous Lemur was supposed to be a Lemure (a shadow-like spirit).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It is. Legends was a wacky set.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

All of Chronicles, actually

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There were white creatures that could redirect any damage to that creature.

I remember discovering a paradox where both players were motivated to redirect damage to their own respective creatures (Albatrosses were involved) and could indefinitely.

I think WoTC was first rude about the paradox and later created some hard-to-interpret rules about conflicting recursions.