738
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 176 points 10 months ago

I love how, despite Musk’s best efforts, 3/4 of the internet still calls the site Twitter.

[-] [email protected] 91 points 10 months ago

We were going to keep calling it Twitter no matter what, but it feels even better knowing how much he loves deadnaming.

[-] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago

“They call it deadnaming because it’s dead. My [Twitter] is dead.”

[-] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

I also like Xitter, because in my head that can only be pronounced Shitter, which is a good name for it.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

You could also pronounce it like Exitter and it still works.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Let's jusy call it Shitter, then.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Hmm, but then we're outwardly dissing it and we can't confidently put it in serious reporting.

And aren't technically respectful disses the best?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

And there is a whole South Park episode with this name.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

My association with X is "Not Wayland".

[-] [email protected] 150 points 10 months ago

Musk will continue being upset with institutions for pulling ads over his favorite content

[-] [email protected] 106 points 10 months ago

Taking bets on how long before Musk sues them.

[-] [email protected] 98 points 10 months ago

Please, please, sue the World Bank Mr. Musk. I am so sure that will go well, and totally won't result in anything bad for all of your massively debt financed businesses.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Another good bet would be when does it go bankrupt or he sell it for a massive loss.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

I would laugh if Dorsey bought it back for pennies on the dollar and turned it right back into what it was before. Playing the long game.

[-] [email protected] 67 points 10 months ago

What the fuck does the world bank need to advertise for?

[-] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago

Public relations

[-] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Trust us, we are printing all this money for your own good.

Your. Own. Good.

Something like that I assume.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago

The world bank isn't involved so much in printing money - that's central banks like the US Federal Reserve or European Central Bank.

They do love to force developing nations to adopt US-style capitalism by withholding loans for needed development projects. They also focus far too much on increasing GDP at all costs and do not give really any weight to increasing living standards or reducing inequality. Basically, think loans to institute Reaganomics and you won't be too far off.

The loans pay for large capital projects (power plants, large-scale irrigation, etc) that are built by the state and then mandated to he handed over to private entities that then charge rents and extract wealth. Not every loan and program is bad, but there's plenty to give pause when they are involved in a project.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

lol who would downvote this?

The - I'm pro World Bank and I'm on Lemmy guy?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Is it so hard to believe some people worship power and wealth beyond ethics and social cohesion?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

There are some countries in Africa that isn't impoverished enough yet.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Trying to expand their market to the Moon and Mars.

[-] [email protected] 50 points 10 months ago

Am i the only one confused about what they thought would happen? Have they not been following the news about twitter for the past year or so? Or were they fine with twitter being covered in nazi stuff until their ad appeared next to one and someone notified them?

[-] [email protected] 45 points 10 months ago

They were fine until they specifically were called out on it.

[-] [email protected] 47 points 10 months ago

That tweet is so racist that I'm surprised Elon didn't tweet a thinking face emoji reacting to it.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago

Who would have guessed that a social media platform owned by an apartheid-loving fascist would trend right wing? I mean, Musk is such a stable genius.

/s just in case.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

And all he had to do was act like he wanted to back track on the offer and the courts forced the sale through quickly rather than slow things down and consider whether social media should even be a privately owned thing run at the whims of a guy that used that same platform to try to ruin someone's life with a baseless pedophilia accusation because they hurt he's feelings when telling him his sub idea wouldn't work and he was just getting in the way rather than helping anything.

I just wonder if the courts fell for his ploy or if they just played the part they were supposed to and the whole thing was an act.

Also, I don't think it's a coincidence that he spent 44 billion on Twitter and then, after pretty much ruining it, for some reason Tesla shareholders (which are majority institutional shareholders) vote through a 50 billion compensation package for him.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 10 months ago

When an organization as problematic as the world Bank won't work with you...

[-] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago

I dare Elon to sue World Bank.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Musk is learning the lesson Google and Youtube learned years ago with the "adpocalypse". If the whole house of cards depends on ad dollars you have to keep them happy.

Unless Musk is going to take X (Twitter) completely subscription only, or fund it exclusively out of his own pocket, he is not going to get that "anything I want goes" utopia he keeps crowing about.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

fund it exclusively out of his own pocket

That's how newspapers got started - they were propaganda organs of the rich and existed exclusively to manipulate public opinion. Things really haven't changed that much, but somewhere along the way people were tricked into paying for them.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Except that libel laws and regulations exist to regulate things like newspapers, not things like random comments by random users you may not even know is a bot account. At the very worst, they can only report on what people are saying and ignore the counterarguments, not present lies as truth. Not that it hasn't been eroded, but it's at least much more costly to attempt to use newspapers for disinformation.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Pretty sure Russia's owners of Twitter really intend it just to be used as a propaganda backwagon platform, like China's TikTok, so the funding does not need to be self-sufficient. As long as they get a critical userbase where they can move their propaganda, nerf the criticism, and can't be taken down because of the ensuing backlash, that's good enough for them.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago

Capitalism: free markets are the only way if you dont like Nazi shit go somewhere else librulz

Also capitalism: Its literally illegal to not give us money and if you take your money elsewhere we'll sue you!

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

At this point anyone advertising on twitter is a piece of shit.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Using... Using twatter

[-] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

Lol. Hahahahahaha. Jajajajajajaj.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

So Apartheid Boy just said the quiet part out loud?

Color me surprised.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Good. Kill the Twitter.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

Thank you Xhitter for blocking ads!

[-] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago
[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Hmmm. Which organization actually empowers the march to fascism globally more? The neo liberal loan sharks or digital Der Stürmer.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
738 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

71716 readers
4606 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS