1393
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 205 points 10 months ago

This isn't a meme, it's a crime

[-] [email protected] 64 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There are literally tens of thousands of people in academia who could build a transparent, open-source, non-profit publishing system of their own.

Why don't they?

[-] [email protected] 86 points 10 months ago

There is a transitioning happening but progress churns slowly. I like to compare it to getting out of an abusive relationship.

https://sparcopen.org/our-work/big-deal-knowledge-base/unbundling-profiles/mit-libraries/

https://tagteam.harvard.edu/hubs/oatp/items

[-] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

It's happening in Germany as well. Universities are banding together to negotiate better deals with publishers - some subscriptions haven't been renewed when the publishers weren't forthcoming. It's not a solution (that would be the wide establishment of independent, self organized/hosted Open Access journals - using Open Journal Systems for example) but it's a start.

https://deal-konsortium.de/en/

[-] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago

Corruption - at the highest level.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Well I don't know about "highest" level.

It's in some ways worse than that. it's institutional corruption and collusion across all levels of power within institutions. Not having access to pear review, journals, the gravitas, the funding sources:it creates a monopoly of power for all players in the system where they aren't benefited by opening up access

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 187 points 10 months ago

Remember folks, if you pirate scientific papers you're stealing from the hard working......wait a minute....

[-] [email protected] 67 points 10 months ago

You wouldn't download a car

[-] [email protected] 69 points 10 months ago
[-] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago

I'd 3D print that shit so hard on my shitty little Ender.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Why stop at one?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 155 points 10 months ago

Academic Authors: $0

FAKE NEWS

This should be in the negatives. We have to pay to get papers published in these traditional journals.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago

And sometimes open access costs money for the author too.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Don't forget the university libraries. Yup, researchers are paid by the university, those researchers pay the publishers to place their articles, the peer reviewers are also paid by the university. And then the university has to shell out money to the publishers, so the articles can be accessed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 96 points 10 months ago

and don't use Sci-hub people. I am warning ⚠️ you so you can avoid it 🫡

[-] [email protected] 64 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Thank you for the warning. I almost received free and convenient access to a large catalog of academic articles, and no one wants that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago
[-] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

Came here to post this. It's so evil, it even has ebooks meant for entertainment.

Never visit downmagaz either!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

dont ever use this, it has almost everything

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 51 points 10 months ago

but wait...

where meme part ?

[-] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago

Internet memes come from the original concept of memes as an element of culture passed on from person to person.

From Wikipedia's "internet meme" article.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 46 points 10 months ago

New textbooks have disappearing ink that only lasts, about one semester, until a month before finals, and then in that month they trigger dynamic pricing increases due to a stronger than typical demand...

[-] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago

Don't give them ideas.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Don't give them ideas for free.

[-] [email protected] 42 points 10 months ago

NGL if I was a college professor in this situation I'd be pirating my own work fuck these guys

[-] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Very frequently you can email the author of the paper and they will be super happy to send you a copy.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

I do it all the time. Something something sci-hub. If you ask, the authors will almost always share a preprint.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 10 months ago

Just like the Olympics. The companies are vampire squids.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago

That's unfair to both vampires and squids

[-] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

vampire squid makes them sound cute, they are literally the scum of the earth: They are leeching billions from what is normally a tax funded sector and on the side heavily polarising publishing and access to science in favor of rich countries.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago

I too want to open a business where both customers and suppliers pay me. Do you know any more gullible sectors? Academics are pretty extorted already it seems.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

Real estate seems to be a popular place for seemingly unnecessary middlemen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago

Reviewers and writers actually do get a stipend, but it's a token amount like 200 bucks a year. This industry is the most ass backward incentive structure we could possibly create, the only reason writers would provide articles to a journal is literally for the clout.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago

Really? I’ve reviewed and published a good chunk of papers and never received any financial compensation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

I've never gotten a stipend or heard of someone getting a stipend for publishing or reviewing manuscripts. The only thing I've been offered is access to the journal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

That's not an incentive, they're mocking you with money

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago

Just here to say fuck Elsevier.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago

Or, publish to PLOS ONE, the open-access science journal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLOS_One

[-] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago

As of April 2021, PLOS One charges a publication fee of $1,745 to publish an article.

I mean, seriously, I would like to publish to one of these, but who has the money to do that?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

I mean, if you consider how much a study costs to get to the point of publication, the publication costs are peanuts in comparison.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

There are many other open-access journals, for example these: https://freejournals.org/. But yes, open-access is the way.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago

I heard that, you are legally allowed to Email the Academic Authors, and request said articles, which they are allowed to provide for free.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago

Absolutely. Plus scientists love when people want to actually read their work so you make their day too!

[-] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

As much as I'm against parasitic practices, I wonder how the inevitable corruption of money would (further) skew research if academia was well paid for their papers.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

We're not saying pay the authors a bunch, we're saying make the papers free to read. Or at least don't charge authors and readers both, while keeping all the money for yourself.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

That seems like a very lucrative market to interrupt

[-] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

Why are we looking at revenue? We don't know the operating costs. What are the profit margins?

[-] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago

According to Wikipedia, in 2022 Elsevier's revenue was 2.909 billion pounds and their net income was 2.021 billion pounds.

Not going to bother looking up the rest.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
1393 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

15517 readers
2736 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS