all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Nice try I'm not clicking on your headline, bitch

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They give the example of "job" vs "occupation" but then talk about the headlines "Meghan and Harry are talking to Oprah. Here’s why they shouldn’t say too much” vs. “Are Meghan and Harry spilling royal tea to Oprah? Don’t bet on it.”

    This doesn't seem to fit the simple words narrative they just set up. To me, this is standard language vs. slang. The first one sounds like it may be objective and fact-based, and the second sounds like it was written by a gabby middle schooler.

    I would likely not be interested in the content either way, but I would be far more likely to click on the drivel-free headline.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [B] -2 points 2 years ago

    The Conversation - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Conversation:

    MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - Australia
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://theconversation.com/readers-prefer-to-click-on-a-clear-simple-headline-like-this-one-236664
    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • source