So ridiculous to call this stolen valor. It's a rank he held, but before he retired they reverted it to a lower rank because he didn't have all the coursework. So yes, he didn't retire at that rank, so the correction is good, but he didn't claim military experience that he didn't have.
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
-24 points (16.7% liked)
Conservative
410 readers
49 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I joined this community hoping for some variety to the lefts constant pissing on the right but what I got in return is the exact same thing directed at the opposite side. Where's the reasonable moderates at that focus on ideas and events, not people?
As someone who supports Donald "Bone Spurs" Trump, Walz is ANTI AMERICAN for CLAIMING one Rank while Retiring at the Rank BELOW!