this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
748 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3231 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 146 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The illegitimate Supreme Court brought it back. Don't forget that Republicans stalled for a year to get one of their Justices, and we have two known perjurers, two that have openly accepted bribes, and an insurrectionist flying fascist flags outside his home.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago (4 children)

There's no court with authority over the Supreme Court. There's no systemic means to operationally define their means as illegitimate.

So, if the system is to be preserved, the rules must be respected, and We the People must tolerate corrupt Justices until they choose to resign or die. But, such is intolerable! The system must yield. But, if it ignores its core rules then it deserves no respect!

It's important that we recognize that various systems are scams and learn how they work. But, often, just like this example, what we find is that the system allows no means of recovery that We the People would find adequate.

They'll always tell us to be patient, to wait for a more convenient time for change, praying that enough of us don't reason our way into enough systemic impasses to do more than cast a meaningless ballot. Most of us have very little and trust each other even less. But, sacrificing for our neighbor is the only way forward.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The government is allowed to impeach them. Legally speaking.

The right will block such an action though because they too are corrupt.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (17 children)

You're not wrong.

And who signs 90% of these apparatchick's paychecks? It's the billionaires.

The billionaires are the ones LARPing as the puppeteers. And if we don't challenge them, their shitty LARPs are uncontested and become real.

The billionaires are the primary beneficiaries of the status quo.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

You guys need to write a new constitution yesterday. The US constitution is an old relic and it's hardly surprising it's so disfunctional.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Been saying that for years. It's been a quarter millennium, how about we get the best and brightest minds from every field of academia, science, philosophy, and yes, even *shudder* religion, to get together and literally hold a constitutional convention? Just toss that old scrap of parchment out and re-write it from scratch, with modern language that is unambiguous and straightforward. If the rights enshrined in the Constitution that we hold so dear to us are actually that important, I'm sure they'll make the cut for Constitution v2.0. But while we're in there, we might as well clarify some stuff. Let's clarify that 14th amendment, let's define what a "well regulated militia" is, and so on.

Of course, the people in power like the ambiguity. It means that as long as someone somewhere could interpret the constitution in some way that is favorable to them, they can have it mean whatever they want when it suits them and as long as they keep the populace at each other's throats with an unending culture war they know we'll never organize enough to change that. It's a bit of a pessimistic outlook. Our fates are controlled by people who like the dysfunction and that sucks because we could very easily fix a lot of the problems by unifying, but I don't know if that's possible at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Pack the court, or order the CIA to assassinate the conservative justices.

Of course neither of these will happen.

Time to get your passports current.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 4 months ago (3 children)

please do not elect Donald Trump for fuck sakes

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago

Not really up to a few hundred terminally online liberals.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Trump is just the current iteration. This is a long term problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

And plan. He's merely a puppet to regain power.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Republicans like this right now because it benefits Donald. It's going to come back and bite them in the ass when it helps their opponents.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (3 children)

But they are the disenfranchised and the poor. They have the right to vote for someone who will gut regulations for corporations that will happily increase to looting and pillaging in the quest for profit.

The fact these people reason that it would be better for them with less regulations and oversight is beyond comprehension.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Republicans have learned that there are millions of votes on one particular issue that will allow them to do whatever on all other issues. Abortion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You're assuming a lot: elections, peaceful transfer of power, Congress composition, even the unity of the states is an assumption at this point. If King Trump gets in, many states will refuse to cooperate (if you think this is too wild, many locales and at least one state already refuse to cooperate with ICE, Texas was at one point not cooperating with the Feds on their Southern border). What happens after that is anyone's guess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

The Democrats love it because is lucrative for donations. It's a terrible storm of pure evil and ineptitude.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I know it's been said as a joke a million times. But it feels like the current POTUS using his immunity for official duties to unilaterally correct this SCOTUS problem that is a flaw overlooked by the founding fathers would be a legitimate, official act that is done with the interest of the country and not for personal gain.

Straight up killing the ones taking bribes and inserting left leaning judges would cause a civil war, and I'm not sure how you can use this immunity situation to correct this problem through policy. Either by creating some sort if oversight, term limits, maybe, since Supreme Court judges are so important they should be elected by the people, not congress, idk. But If immunity to crimes is the hot topic right now, water board them all.

If Biden ordered their assassination he would have my vote and donations to his campaign.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If Biden assassinates, pardon me, official acts out of existence at least Thomas and Roberts, or better yet all 6 of the servative judges, I promise I will forget for 4 more years that Tim Walz, Marianne Williamson, and Jill Stein even exist. I won't even mention their names. I will be a Biden-stan for the next 4 years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do you... Not like Tim Walz? Genuine question, as someone from MN.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Love Tim Walz, he's the best.

But if Biden does the deed above, I can be an exclusive Biden-stan for 4 years. IF!

4 years. Not forever.

And only with regard to presidency.

Outside of the context of the presidential election I can (and probably will, unless something important changes) still be a Tim Walz stan even if Biden does the deed.

As long as Biden refuses to exercise ruthlessness in my name and with my approval I will be bringing up Tim Walz as a vastly superior presidential candidate to Harris, Newsom, Whitmer, and the typical gaggle of the establishment picks.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Power grows out of the barrel of a gun.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wait a minute...

Grabs the SCOTUS by the hair and removes the mask revealing them to really be

"King George?!"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Da da da dat da dat da da da ya da
Da da dat da da ya da!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm gonna start growing veggies. I need to get all the gravel out of my back yard first. I need to spend money to practice at the range, ballistic tubes is the most expensive hobby. Today I'm organizing and helping John Brown breakfast club. What other actionable goals should I focus on to dismantle our newly founded monarchy, comrades?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If you have close friends with similar views make sure they get armed. Make sure they still vote and don't head down the path of extremism either. Go to your jobs. Make sure you family is still taken care of...

But remember that feeling in the back of your head saying get prepared, and do it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Awesome I worked on that today 🤘

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I recommend highly conscious and aware physical fitness, which is to say doing the exercises with full internal awareness of all that's going on subjectively in your world while performing the exercises.

If you can only do one thing, let it be running. Land on the bowls of your feet while wearing zero offset running shoes (web search "zero offset running shoes"), heels ever so slightly off the ground. Never heel-stomp during running. Relax deeply. Let the belly drop naturally. Consciously slow down your breathing and try to breathe as slowly as possible while running. While running attempt to enter a state similar to sleeping without actually losing awareness. So this here is work for both the body and the mind. Adjust your pace to make running pleasurable and slightly challenging in order to habituate your relationship to running as something you enjoy doing and something you look forward to. Get plenty of recuperation time, don't run non-stop, take breaks and let the body and mind recover. If you're older the breaks have to be longer too.

Then if you have more time and energy I recommend body weight exercises including pullups.

If you still have energy left, run with the kettlebells.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is "born to run" by Christopher McDougall running theory right? My knees are kinda bad now so I get most of my aerobic exercise from bicycles now. I should probably find some grass or dirt to run in.

I need to set up a pull bar.

I usually clean and press kettlebells when I'm watching YouTube trash.

Are battle maces worth it? I kinda think just beating a sledgehammer hammer into the ground would be an equivalent range of motion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This is "born to run" by Christopher McDougall running theory right?

First I hear of this McDougall. I learned everything I typed on my own, painfully, by running in all the wrong ways first. That's why I was about 42 when I learned how to run.

That said, if McDougall says the same things I say, great! No one should suffer injuries from heel stomping like I had. No one should go through the same hell as I. No one should have to cough up blood from their lungs due to overly rapid breathing, like I had. No one should believe the rate of breathing is a fixed and inborn quality. Instead everyone should know that the rate of breathing is a trainable quality. And the rate of breathing depends on the calmness of one's deep mind. The calmer the mind, the slower the breathing can be. Hence why I advised to enter a sleep-like state.

I also combined running with meditation and psychoenergetic training (I learned psychoenergetics from Nanci Trivellato and Robert Bruce). That's basically it in a nutshell.

Are battle maces worth it? I kinda think just beating a sledgehammer hammer into the ground would be an equivalent range of motion.

Don't know about that, boss.

It probably depends on your goals?

I suggested running first because that one exercise just does waaaaaaay too much benefit in waaaaaay too many areas.

But there are lots of highly specific exercises like partial lifts, finger strength, static exertions, dynamic tension a la Charles Atlas, etc. All depends on your goals and time/energy availability.

What I described will make one tough and resilient like a solder with an endless gas tank.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They've created an Emperor with themselves as Popes.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

248 years of democracy, it was a good run bois

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Saying the USA has been a democracy for 248 years is a bit of a stretch. when:

White men who didn't own land didn't get to vote everywhere in the USA until 1868.
Main-land Native American males who left their tribes and lived like white people could start to vote in 1887.
The above but for Alaska in 1915. In 1925, they needed to also be able to pass an English literacy test to vote.
Women were allowed to vote in the 1920's.
Black people were allowed to vote in the 1960's.
The act that prohibits racial discrimination for voting rights was passed in 1965.
Alaska Natives were able to vote without taking an English literacy test, a language which they may not speak, in 1970.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

The cons have been upset with the founding of America ever since its outset.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

“We” didn’t do shit. People in 1776 did, today’s Americans wouldn’t reject it out of fear for consequence to personal comfort.

load more comments
view more: next ›