top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 198 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 75 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 131 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    And this is why I don't have ANY moral qualms about pirating shit: they'd do it to us in a heartbeat if there was a buck to be made.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 105 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Pirating Windows for your own personal, private use, which will never directly make you a single dollar: HIGHLY ILLEGAL

    Scraping your creative works so they can make billions by selling automated processes that compete against your work: Perfectly fine and normal!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 93 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Sure bud, pirating some Microsoft Studio video games and windows ISOs right now. What? I found them on the open web!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 83 points 2 years ago

    DMCA for them, no DMCA for us.

  • source
  • [–] 65 points 2 years ago

    You're always morally justified to steal from Microsoft

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So if I see it on the “open web”, I’m free to use it however I please? Oh, I get thrown in jail and everything I own taken away.

    If companies are people per “citizens united”, why doesn’t the same apply to them?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    And if a company makes a negligent decision, which kills a million people over time, why is no one being put on death row? They can and do have it both ways, but I can still wish for a just world where if companies are people, they can be put to death for mass casualties caused by their decisions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    so we can steal Microsoft's products?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yes. Exactly. Although there isn't much left worth stealing from Microsoft.

    (This was a low-key "Microsoft bad, Linux supreme", comment.)

    (And now it's no longer low-key.)

    (I'm using a touch-screen keyboard for writing this. And yet I can't open my doors using the keyboard. Ever wondered why that is?)

    (Correct, because I forgot my keys at home and didn't put them on my keyboard.)

    (Now it's just a –board.)

    (Oral diarrhea over. Go get some guhd Linux!)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is the year of the linux desktop!

    By our powers combined, we'll exceed 2% market share!

    (no actually, please support linux. I just switched like a month ago and while it's so much better than windows there are so many petty annoyances that will never get resolved unless more people bitch about it and that kind of support needs more users)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 37 points 2 years ago

    In other news: we have lawyers to protect our copyrights, you don't. Suck it.

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    It's okay to plagiarize books if they're in a library.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 34 points 2 years ago (7 children)
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (22 children)
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    "Copying is theft" is the argument of corporations for ages, but if they want our data and information, to integrate into their business, then, suddenly they have the rights to it.

    If copying is not theft, then we have the rights to copy their software and AI models, as well, since it is available on the open web.

    They got themselves into quite a contradiction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    Issue is power imbalance.

    There's a clear difference between a guy in his basement on his personal computer sampling music the original musicians almost never seen a single penny from, and a megacorp trying to drive out creative professionals from the industry in the hopes they can then proceed to hike up the prices to use their generative AI software.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 27 points 2 years ago

    Aight, I'ma steal leaked Windows XP source code :3

  • source
  • [+] 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    There is a thing called usage licenses.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    So its no longer intellectual property if its on the internet? The nerves on this guy...

    So you could just copy and use every single helpful support article from Microsoft?

    Oh shit, there aren't any

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    Just yet another proof, that the more 0's you have in your valuation, the less the laws apply to you

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Does Netflix count as the open web? It definitely feels like so, but I'm ready for a wealth hoarder to tell me otherwise!

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Apparently he thinks data is like the ducks you find in the park

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Wait, you can steal from those ducks?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Is his personal-information on the dark-web?

    Is he saying that if his personal-information is on the dark-web, then it's perfectly-OK for everybody & their robot to be using it??

    XOR is he saying that there are 2 kinds of law:

    1 for protecting his entitlement,

    the other for disallowing rights from the lives he consumes, through his beloved herd/corporation/pseudo-person?

    ( obviously, he's already answered the latter )

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Oh hey, Microsoft support moving away from copyright! Trollface

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Essentially the joke everyone made about nfts.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    He's right, information wants to be free. Don't support stronger copyright just to spite people it'll benefit

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    I think that with respect to content that’s already on microsoft.com, the social contract of that content since the ‘90s has been that it is fair use. Anyone can copy it, recreate with it, reproduce with it. That has been “freeware,” if you like, that’s been the understanding.

    Yeah, that's how I've always thought of it.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Copyright infrigment is not theft, training models is not copyright infringement either. We need a law equivalent to when an artist says "he's inpired by someone else" . That it specifically is illegal to do that without permission if you use a machine. That will force big tech to pay a pittance for it and it will instakill all the small player.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Its not stolen if it is still there afterwards.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

    You cant steal data. violating copyright (Which ai training does not do) is not theft.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›