this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
39 points (75.3% liked)

Science

233 readers
1 users here now

Community for discussion about experiments or discoveries made with scientific methods.

Links to articles: please preserve headlines when possible, shortening / replacing as needed. When multiple articles are involved, please consider a text post.

If there is a narrower community available, discussion is encouraged there.

If a topic relates more closely to application of knowledge than obtaining it, discussion is encouraged in c/technology.

Attribution for the banner image: Image by FreePik

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

And even suggests bone density is the same too despite what transphobes have been claiming here on lemmy lately...

Transgender women’s bone density was found to be equivalent to that of cisgender women, which is linked to muscle strength.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

IOC funded, but they were happy enough to throw us under the bus with their last trans inclusion policy, so I don't see this making any difference. They're not interested in science or fairness, they're interested in not rocking the boat

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Quite refreshing that this article was published by Forbes. Even tho I think more studies need to be made, I would argue that it's public perception that needs changing. Public perception is not necessarily influenced by science, if that was the case we would be living in different societies worldwide. I think public perception is more influenced by the existing narratives, and we have a saying on them. Maybe among other things, we might need to start asking different/new questions?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Let the stammering retroactive qualifications by transphobes to explain away their chronic ignorance begin!