119
What is the evidence? Let's look, and there isn't any. Everything in this is based on fake news and MAGA talking points. There isn't anything in this that occurred.
Evidence!?! Well number ONE he has a LAPTOP, honey and number TWO his name is BIDEN!
What more EVIDENCE do you NEED, honey?
The only evidence they need is the fact that he's a Democrat and therefore must be evil by the conservative categorical hierarchical construct
Isn't even any evidence of the laptop part.
I would say the evidence available suggests that I would not want Hunter Biden in a position of power in my government. Good thing he's not.
The plea bargain is its own thing, first offenders generally get a pass unless they've done something heinous.
"The evidence continues to mount by the day," Steube said without providing details about the evidence he was citing.
Republicans are really trying hard to lose the next election.
Not to be a bummer but their base eats this shit up for breakfast then turns out to vote even harder once it gets shot down.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, “must get even for impeaching Trump twice.” 🙄
Republicans are like toddlers going from one temper tantrum to the next and it’s exhausting.
"The Biden Crime Family has personally profited of Joe's government positions through bribery, threats, and fraud. Joe Biden must not be allowed to continue to sit in the White House, selling out our country," Steube continued.
Ironic that's essentially everything Donnie has actually been indicted for
Yep, Republicans are projecting on more screens than the Barbie movie with that utter nonsense.
They haven't yet been indicted for the obstruction of justice during the Muller investigation - that was the one where the whole family was involved.
and it’s exhausting.
That's the point. They just fling shit until you're overwhelmed and exhausted dealing with it all that you can't properly do anything else.
"Debating Republicans on anything is rather like trying to play chess with a pigeon; it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory."
Joe is guilty of being Biden, which is clearly an impeachable offense as described in the ConStiTUtioN
Pretty sure someone already did this and the Republicans killed it by referring to committee. Because they don't want anyone in an even slightly purple seat to have to vote on this.
I think the majority of them don't want this to get to a vote. They're in a shitty situation where they have to convince moderate and independent voters that they're not extremists or super far right -- but they also need to satisfy their extremist base or they're getting primaried out as a RINO in the swamp. Republican leadership keeps trying to carefully thread that needle, and the extremist wing constantly gets in their way of doing so.
hunter biden eh? but yet total silence on jared kushner
They really want a Harris presidency, don't they? It's past the midterms, if they hurry up, she could get 9 years in!
Sounds like he's hoping he can use the word "Biden" over and over, describing every infraction of Hunter and hope the Senate and American people are too dumb to know he's not actually talking about the President.
Kind of like when they attacked Obama for his policies in Libya, threatening to impeach him, threatening to defund operations, then going "Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi!" completely forgetting they were totally opposed to doing ANYTHING in Libya and that, yeah, Benghazi is, in fact, in Libya.
And that Bush is the reason there wasn't enough security in the first place.
Impeach their guy one time, and they respond with so much bad faith BS. This is child like behavior
One time?
Sorry, a couple times
Wait, wasn't the thing they're accusing Hunter of, the whole "selling access" thing something that happened years ago before Biden was ever President?
Boebert and MTG inconsolable
ROFL…. k.
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
119 points (90.5% liked)
politics
24428 readers
2209 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS