810
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 115 points 1 year ago

academic journals now only provide a service to authors. they used to distribute... but the articles are available free on the arxiv, pubmed, authors websites, etc. the peer review and typesetting journals do is a joke and no author will pay for that.

the value journals have now is mainly to the author, because the prestige of getting accepted by the journal helps with the authors career. publishers figured out that authors will pay for this, so here we are ... 🙄

[-] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago

I used to have trust in the peer review process, thinking this is why it takes months or years for a paper to get published. Are you telling me it’s not real?

[-] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago

iwriting reviews is time consuming, unpaid, and doesn't help the reviewers career. so it takes a while because reviewers are already busy and don't prioritize writing reviews too much.

quality of the reviews is questionable. 10% of the reviews are through and provide valuable feedback. the remaining 90% are cursory "yeah this is interesting, publish it" or "not interesting/outside scope".

very very few reviews find and report scientific errors

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

find and report scientific errors

Hell, the fact that any articles have been published with the openAI "I can't provide up-to-date info" means that shit's not getting read properly, overall.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Though errors are somewhat monitored by Retraction Watch.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Sounds like you already worked it out.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Depends on what journal is reviewing the paper.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago

The value of a scientists, how funny this world is

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

In so many more ways than one... :-(

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

"How much are they?" is a question.

"How much they are" is a statement.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

And "How much they are?" is a question. See? Question mark right there.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Why think that work you how?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Descriptivistic nanomachines, son!

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Descriptivism doesn't mean people can't fuck up.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
810 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

15165 readers
2089 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS