142
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by GFGJewbacca@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world

A new South Dakota policy to stop the use of gender pronouns by public university faculty and staff in official correspondence is also keeping Native American employees from listing their tribal affiliations in a state with a long and violent history of conflict with tribes.

Two University of South Dakota faculty members, Megan Red Shirt-Shaw and her husband, John Little, have long included their gender pronouns and tribal affiliations in their work email signature blocks. But both received written warnings from the university in March that doing so violated a policy adopted in December by the South Dakota Board of Regents.

“I was told that I had 5 days to remove my tribal affiliation and pronouns,” Little said in an email to The Associated Press. “I believe the exact wording was that I had ‘5 days to correct the behavior.’ If my tribal affiliation and pronouns were not removed after the 5 days, then administrators would meet and make a decision whether I would be suspended (with or without pay) and/or immediately terminated.”ersity employee emails

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] undercrust@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 years ago

Boy, South Dakota really challenging Tennessee and Texas for shittiest State in the Union eh? Haven't even heard about Florida in months because of these bozos.

[-] mynachmadarch@kbin.social 28 points 2 years ago

Florida just banned lab grown meat and removed climate change targets from their books. So, the usual for them.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Mississippi is still worse than all of them, but it's not for lack of all of them trying 😮‍💨

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 years ago

How will employees of the University of South Dakota write emails without using pronouns?

[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 26 points 2 years ago

This sounds ripe for malicious compliance.

[-] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago

I'm convinced they don't know what pronouns are.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 years ago

Almost always the case when it comes to banning pronouns

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago

Sorry, you're just gonna have to guess what gender Professor Smith is because asking is now illegal.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Assuming pronouns is also forbidden. Professor Smith shall always be addressed in the third person.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Writing emails without pronouns is harder than guessing Professor Smith's gender.

btw you're fired for using pronouns in that comment.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

We don’t want any of that identity politics, so let’s just ban identities.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 9 points 2 years ago

I’m no expert, but this doesn’t sound completely legal. It’ll be nice when the assholes that wrote/enforce this policy get the "correction" they deserve.

this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
142 points (96.7% liked)

News

36270 readers
2721 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS