this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
185 points (98.4% liked)

World News

38979 readers
3364 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Fewer than 20,000 babies were born in Korea in February, a record low for the month

The number of live births in Korea fell below 20,000 in February, a record low for the month.

According to a report on population trends for February published by Statistics Korea on Wednesday, there were 19,362 live births that month, representing a 3.3% decrease from February of last year. That was the fewest live births in the month of February since the Korean government began tracking the figure in 1981, as well as the first time the February live births figure has dropped below 20,000.

The provisional figure for live births in February 2023 (published that April) had also clocked in below 20,000 (19,939), but the official figure was later revised to 20,020.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I had no idea there were that many months in February

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Turns out string theory is 100% correct, and one of the pocket dimensions broke open, and it was full of time.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Population reduction will cause a lot of interim pain but might be what we need to increase the sustainability of the planet. In next 70 years, we might see a drastic reduction in populations of china and India as well. The lower human population will hopefully allow the planet to recover from the last 100 years uncontrolled resource extraction.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Oh cool, ecofascism. The unsustainable practices we have are what's killing the planet, not the scale of human lives specifically. And as long as that doesn't change, we have no future.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

For the dummies like me, this article references only South Korean birth rates.