this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024
64 points (98.5% liked)

UK Politics

3103 readers
269 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

were shown in three focus groups, in Wokingham

Hmmmm 🤔

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm surprised the Tories haven't tried to rename that town.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

The War on Wokingham?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's reassuring to hear that people here are immune(ish) to culture wars

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

We don’t have the huge divides in culture and religiosity that’s present in places like USA, which means trying to import and apply those wars don’t stick as well here.

The only angle the Tories could really work from is immigration, but they’ve damaged their own reputation there it’s become a double edged sword.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The irony of this coming from the guardian…

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've only ever seen positive spins on trans issues from the Guardian. Radicalise me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I don't know where you've inferred trans people from, but the UK branch of The Guardian has been pretty transphobic for years, so much so that the US Guardian wrote an op-ed criticising them for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Oh, well that explains it then. I must only be familiar with the American Guardian, that's why I respect them. Had no idea there was two of them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

What do you mean? They have such a great art and recipe section. They must be the good guys... right? Right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Voters have been left frustrated with “desperate” culture war tactics deployed by politicians and are prepared to punish those who use them at the ballot box, a survey has found.

Electoral strategies based on culturally charged and divisive issues repulse swing and undecided voters, who see politicians as “playing to the crowd” or “jumping on the bandwagon”, according to research from More in Common commissioned by 38 Degrees.

The MaxDiff experiment revealed the public were more likely to throw campaign adverts “in the bin” that focused on culture war messages rather than local issues.

The researchers highlight that for Labour to win a workable majority it needs a broad coalition of voters spread efficiently in seats across the country, rather than amassing votes among its base concentrated in a smaller number of constituencies.

Many Tories believe that Anderson speaks for ordinary working people, even after he said that the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, is controlled by Islamists or that nurses should not need to use food banks.

The research noted that knowledge of the culture wars was highest among progressive activists who took part in online debates and were highly politically engaged.


The original article contains 653 words, the summary contains 192 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!