Aiding genocide is a bad look
Edit: who would have thought that statement was controversial
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
119 points (87.0% liked)
politics
19088 readers
3785 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This community has a lot of pro-genocide centrists.
No, cmon, please, living through significant impactful history is exhausting. We don’t want to do it anymore. Please just stop.
Congratulation! You have selected
Third once-in-a-lifetime economic crisis
9/11 and it's aftermath
Subprime crisis
Pandemic
We've already had three.
We've had three yes, but what about 4th crisis?
Capitalism is the most efficient way to allocate resources (to the 1%)
And don’t forget that we’re in the middle of getting a new Cold War going, what with Russia and China’s strategic plans for the near to mid-term future conflicting with what pretty much everyone else in the world is planning.
That gave me minor heart palpitations…
Because I don’t have it in me (literally) to give more… 😟
Fucking hate some board games… 🙂↕️
"May you live in interesting times."
In the DNC boardroom: "What can we possibly do to help Trump so we can go on vacation again? Ooohh! I know! Let's go in halvsies on a genocide!"
If Biden starts a war with Iran, he needs to drop out of the race. He won’t possibly be able to win.
The options for Dems will be to find another candidate or throw their support behind Bobby Kennedy. Otherwise, it’s Trump.
Nahh, I would say 90% of us here will be voting for Biden.
Will some be stupid enough to vote for a Bobby Kennedy? Maybe? But I suspect a vast minority.
load more comments
(52 replies)
Why can’t we replace Biden with Bernie instead? Kennedy is a nut job.
I'd like to vote Bernie in the general. I'd like it better about 8 years ago.
He's 8 years older than he was then. I think that's part of why he doesn't run. He wants the younger generation to take it up.
I really hope they do. The current set of democrats risk allowing the Republicans to get a solid foothold across demos that, normally, wouldn't be as split.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
As Gaza’s death toll climbs and famine looms, criticism of Israel’s conduct of the war has been growing from the left and even the centre, with some calling for an end to US arms supplies.
This pressure, and the recent deaths of World Central Kitchen aid workers in Gaza, seemed to finally prompt a shift in Biden’s tone.
The Democratic senator John Fetterman, no friend of pro-Palestinian protesters, told CNN’s State of the Union: “It really demonstrates how it’s astonishing that we are not standing firmly with Israel and there should never be any kinds of conditions on all of that.
Amid the drumbeat for rallying against a common foe, Democrats who call for military aid to be conditioned will be accused of tone deaf appeasement.
On Sunday, the Washington news agenda was dominated by speculation over Biden can dissuade Netanyahu from striking back – “Take the win,” he reportedly said – and prevent a wider regional war, and whether Congress might now pass military aid for both Israel and Ukraine.
Gaza – where Israel’s offensive has killed at least 33,729 people, mostly women and children, according to the territory’s Hamas-run health ministry – was no longer uppermost in the thoughts of politicians or the journalists who interview them.
The original article contains 744 words, the summary contains 209 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
view more: next ›