236
submitted 2 years ago by cyu@sh.itjust.works to c/unions@lemmy.ml
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 70 points 2 years ago

At that point just burn it down.

Unionization WAS the alternative to killing the factory owner in front of his wife and kids.

Bleed the 1%

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I vote we have him gibbeted.

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 30 points 2 years ago

Courts love thst bullshit.

I look forward to future developments.

[-] EchoCT@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago

I'd also be ok with a firesale of his assets.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago

He's doing this with LLCs? What a moron.

[-] argentcorvid@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago

If you are going to do dick moves, do them with C corporations. Because C corps are independent entities, you can better maintain an "arm's length" relationship.

So you shut down your business, even if the courts decide "technically correct" on rehiring, your old business is still on the hook for back wages.

"shutting down" doesn't magically absolve you of financial obligations.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 9 points 2 years ago

Hate to break it to you, but it often does. Something might be able to be done in this case becsuse it was so blatant.

[-] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

For this guy using LLCs it definitely won't.

But if somebody like Walmart / J&J do it with a subsidiary they guaranteed get away with it.

this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
236 points (99.2% liked)

unions

2150 readers
1 users here now

a community focused on union news, info, discussion, etc

Friends:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS