236
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago

At that point just burn it down.

Unionization WAS the alternative to killing the factory owner in front of his wife and kids.

Bleed the 1%

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I vote we have him gibbeted.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

Courts love thst bullshit.

I look forward to future developments.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I'd also be ok with a firesale of his assets.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

He's doing this with LLCs? What a moron.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

If you are going to do dick moves, do them with C corporations. Because C corps are independent entities, you can better maintain an "arm's length" relationship.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

So you shut down your business, even if the courts decide "technically correct" on rehiring, your old business is still on the hook for back wages.

"shutting down" doesn't magically absolve you of financial obligations.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Hate to break it to you, but it often does. Something might be able to be done in this case becsuse it was so blatant.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

For this guy using LLCs it definitely won't.

But if somebody like Walmart / J&J do it with a subsidiary they guaranteed get away with it.

this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
236 points (99.2% liked)

unions

1996 readers
96 users here now

a community focused on union news, info, discussion, etc

Friends:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS