174
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago

My biggest concern is they will hold your data hostage if you don't pay or try to leave.

[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Also, how can we be assured the privacy practices of their subscription/payment platform are at least better than the (likely blockable) trackers?

Forming a financial relationship with a website is, theoretically, infinitely more traceable to your personal identity than all the cookies in the world.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

My bank would probably tell everyone before they did.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Can't do that in the EU (thank you GDPR).

Anti Commercial AI thingyCC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Im in the US. The law dose not apply to businesses who can pay bribes.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

but they do this here anyway, at least in germany

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Sadly, they are doing it in spain, the judges recently stated that they can do it, and few days later almost all of the spanish newspappers had it.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

Privacy is not paid for. Privacy is taken. it is something that only you can achieve for yourself. paying ransom money will do little

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

Even if you pay them, your privacy is gone. Any part of you placed in someone else's hands makes privacy a joke

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Now they got ya financial info! Even less privacy!

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I misread pay as gay and I thought this thread was going to get spicy

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Is € 251.88 the estimated loss in revenue? I would like to say that it only makes sense if you assume the user will be on the platform either way, instead of just not paying and leaving. However, my experience with others makes me believe they will take whatever option to get to what they want.

I think it's a situation for policy but, at least here in the US, our policy makers aren't in the ethical or learned position to be effective.

What I'm saying is, the boat has holes and I'm concerned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

The reason is because your country doesn't have a GDPR

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

The main reason is because the vast majority of people do not care or lack foresight of where that trend has been taking us for over 17 years. Surely you have friends or family who do not care. I do.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

GDPR is EU legislation, noyb is an EU organisation. What are you talking about?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Needs more pihole.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Just avoid using them. Expecting free services without giving out anything is naive.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
174 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

39542 readers
382 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS