this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
52 points (90.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26707 readers
1645 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics.


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

With the tentative success of the UPS Teamsters, the seemingly growing unionization of Starbucks locations, and the ongoing SAG-AFTRA strike, is it...appropriate to have some optimism for the working/salaried classes in the US?

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

pessimistic take: still underpaid

optimistic take: wealthy understand this and are willing to pay a little more to cover worker costs to keep the machine running so raises will come

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

...by putting their prices up

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

It's not warrented, but it's necessary.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some of this fight has to be legislative. We need to repeal Taft-Hartley.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Legislative solutions would be optimal, but over half of Congress are fascists/fascist enablers and the vast majority of them all are corporatists. Labor organizing and strikes are on-the-ground and happen much faster than hoping for a Democratic majority in 2024.

Even getting that majority only brings a slim chance of any good legislative action.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Yet, theres a looming threat of generative AI heavily disrupting the job landscape for many people.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

In Canada recently we had the largest strike in Canada's history from the public servants union and the deal they ended up getting was actually worse than the offer they started out with. However everyone voted to ratify it because of strike fatigue, and because the union did a shit job allocating strike pay. The union leaders have been gaslighting the members saying it's a better deal, but literally the only gain was a lump sum payment of $2000 (in exchange for locking an extra year into the contract with raises that don't keep up with inflation). The management decided to take advantage of how poor and desperate everyone is in the union to basically bribe them with a one time payment rather than make any concessions on pay or benefits.

So no, I'm not optimistic. A lot of people have been trampled on for so long that they are willing to accept a slightly lighter trampling instead of not being trampled on at all.