this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
163 points (91.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35892 readers
1318 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: to clarify, I know that many short hair styles don’t have a part at all. Mostly talking about people with hair long enough to have one. I find it interesting that many studies conclude that beauty is tightly correlated with how symmetrical someone’s face is. However, many haircuts and hair styles are asymmetrical, including any style with the part off-center (very common for both male and female hair styles). Not just that, but we really like the way these haircuts and styles look too. It makes me wonder why one’s perception of beauty might not take into account the symmetry of one’s hair. I don’t have an opinion on what looks better, symmetrical vs not symmetrical as I think it depends on the person and what suits them. I am wondering if anyone else has thought about this.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

I don't think "tightly" is the right word here. Some studies seem to show that symmetry is not linked with attractiveness so much as asymmetry is linked with unattractiveness. For example:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7644543/

"In this experiment, the authors performed a manipulation that altered asymmetry within a face without altering the mean size of facial features. These faces were then rated on attractiveness. Contrary to what was predicted, faces that were made more symmetrical were perceived as being less attractive"

As for hair, it seems that humans don't really link hair to the face in terms of attractiveness in the sense we would expect. For example:

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00377/full

The study found that the attractiveness of a person’s hair can influence how attractive their face is perceived to be, but only if the person evaluating the attractiveness of the face has not previously evaluated the attractiveness of the hair.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your hair is not your face

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the kind of insight we need

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Short and to the point.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

Then your symmetric hairline would draw attention to the lack of symmetry on your face. (Royal you)

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

A symmetrical face with asymmetrical elements is still attractive.

I mean, you're not talking about the face, per se, when you're talking about haircuts. No one thinks Cindy Crawford looks less beautiful because she has a mole on her face.

The face is still symmetrical, it's just adorned by asymmetry in other elements. And, I for one, love asymmetrical elements.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

It's possible that having certain asymmetrical elements ENHANCE the symmetry of your face.

If everything is symmetrical, then any little imperfection or flaw will stand out like a sore thumb.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Asymmetry can be hot. Observe:

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any mention of asymmetric beauty needs to include Natalie Dormer:

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

She looks symmetrical to me though...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

No kidding. She's perfectly symmetrical when she's not smiling. She just has a cute little crooked smile and everyone shouts "asymmetrical!!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Here's Matpat's recent video on this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Mirror symmetry is just one kind of symmertry.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

i like this question

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Not everyone puts being beautiful and attractive to others above their own desires and needs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It has less to do with hair and more to do with facial features

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I don't have any more hair lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I have a cowlick near my natural centre part, so I end up having a huge forehead. Parting my hair slightly off-centre fixes that problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Gotta cover the bad side so you cant see how asymmetrical my face is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's because it doesn't! That is a myth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Because only a few people have a truly symmetrical face. Your hair acts as a sort of frame and so a middle part can end up emphasizing the imbalances that exist and thus make you look more lopsided. There are also additional considerations to a beautiful face. Symmetry is one, proportion is the other. You can have a very symmetrical face but if your features are smaller or larger in relation to it as a whole, then that can ding off a few points on the "beauty" meter.

That's why asymmetrical hairstyles can work so much better. It can shape your face in accordance to its symmetry and proportion and thus make it appear more balanced.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I guess hair is never really symmetrical (think of curls and "flowing" hair) so you don't associate it with health and beauty like someone's face. Hair that is full and thick like the TV tells me hair should be is probably the sign of beauty we look for.

But what do I know, I'm as symmetric as a Salvador Dali painting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I didnt know that was true. Some famous people ive seen called really attractive dont have perfectly symmetrical faces. In fact for some of them its not too hard to notice the asymmetry but theyre still really attractive.. i think the amount that symmetry comes into play might not be as high as other stuff like the shape/size of features, if at all. but ya.

Also for the hair thing i think is just bc some hairstyles look cuter than others depending on the person. Not necessarily middle part for everyone tho is not bad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Because...
If you part it to the Left, it's Not Right.
If you part it to the Right, it's Wrong.
Not Right = Wrong
So, Left must = Right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Pretty sire people look for symmetry in face body BC it is indication of "health" "fitness for reproduction"

Hair is judged by different standard, style is not relevant to its health

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It sounds like you've figured out how to get a leg-up on all of us in the dating pool. I say rock that middle part and enjoy the fruits of this brilliant discovery.

load more comments
view more: next ›