Are you saying the anarchists that worked / work with these frameworks where and are doing things without being evil on purpose, but are still doing evil things?
I just wanted to add that because many people tend to believe that the police will be "good" when socialist or communists take over the state.
John will also evict your neighbor familiy, help deport your buddy from across the street, enforce drug laws that criminalize an addiction, protect the politicians and capitalists, will be part of a system that is absolutely useless in dealing with abusers and and and...
Capitalism. Final answer.
Cops where also bastards in socialist states. They just defended a different ruling class
So they are all polite and politically correct when they help in an eviction or a deportation? Btw which country are you refering to?
How many screws should the screw-maker make?
They probably get asked every day for some screws. They are either capable to extrapolate this into a reasonable monthly goal or they ask for help from someone who is good at that. If they make a mistake and make not enough, than people who need screws will probably have to wait a little. And if they make to many, they can spend their time doing something else. Like where actually is the problem here? We dont need perfection in an anarchist society.
They could even create a guild or syndicate or something with other screwmakers to help each other out in materials, when one is unable to work, when a communities needs emergency screws etc.
And if screw making to meet everyones need is so shitty that nobody would want to do it, then everybody who is able to should do part of it and as a community think of a process that makes this possible and maybe even good by whatever metric they care about.
only necessary in military for coordinated action.
Thats not true. Hierarchy in convential and historical militaries is used for many reasons, such as that the military serves the interest of those at the top.
Other conflict scenarios such as riots show that hierarchy is not necessary to win or reach certain goals.
I would like to add that some anarchist tendencies are less decentralized, but still aim to be non hierarchical. They often use direct democracy for decision making and delegation (which can be revoked at any time) for tasks. So for example big syndicalist unions or big anarchist organizations (which are tbh rare).
Communist claim many things. They claim China is socialist, they claim the first international was maknly Marxist, they always claim their enemies are liberals etc. Always check their claims and irgnore them if they are made up.
There is a difference between asking nicely / rudely and speaking collectively with the ability to present actual consequences, such as defederation of most non lemmy.world instances or full boykott of all lemmy.world communities.
But nobody is actually killing any genociders. They are just saying it should be done. Which doesnt actually do anything, its just radical posturing without any meaningful impact on things.
But why tho? We dont need to exploit cheap labor in anarchism, so this sounds like an undesirable setup.
One of the goals of anarchism might be turning back globalism for unnecessary things while keeping those things that are benifitial for humans and as well as rest of the earth.
I say we can live without that.