[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

They're all fried tubers. I'll let it slide. The real travesty is no fried yuca on the list.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 5 days ago

It's an old saying. The Empire had colonies all over the world so at any point in time it was day for at least one colony. Therefore the sun never set on The Empire as a whole.

The joke is making fun of that old saying, pretending it means there is no night for the British isles and all the sun is causing the temperature of the isles to increase.

I hope that's enough explanation to remove any humor from the joke.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

Also in dreams.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

This was my first thought too. I guess clouds are scary to me now.

206
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The overarching goal of communism is for laborers to own the means of production instead of an owning/capitalist class. Employee owned businesses are the realization of communism within a capitalist society.

It seems to me that most communist organizations in capitalist societies focus on reform through government policies. I have not heard of organizations focusing on making this change by leveraging the capitalist framework. Working to create many employee owned businesses would be a tangible way to achieve this on a small but growing scale. If successful employee owned businesses are formed and accumulate capital they should be able to perpetuate employee ownership through direct acquisition or providing venture capital with employee ownership requirements.

So my main questions are:

  1. Are organizations focusing on this and I just don't know about it?
  2. If not, what obstacles are there that would hinder this approach to increasing the share labor collective ownership?
122
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

How did we get so casual about conspiracy theories?

I was talking with someone today about nutrition. This person has a PhD in material science. They mentioned eating beef daily and I asked about the cholesterol implications. The answer was about a vague 'they' wanted us to think that, but it wasn't true anymore.

I hear the vague 'they' so frequently now it's just a normal conversation. In truth, as soon as I hear the vague they I dismiss the speaker's credibility on the subject, but how did we get here? Vague they wanted us to think X is a valid counter argument by the most highly educated people in our society?

This sounds like more of a rant than a question, but I do truly want to know how this happened? Was it pop culture like the X Files that made conspiracy theories main stream? Was it social media? When will the vague they stop being an accepted explanation? Has it always been this way and I didn't notice?

Thanks, love you!

12
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Energy in physics feels analogous to money in economics. Is a manmade medium of exchange used for convenience. It is the exchange medium between measureable physical states/things.

Is energy is real in the same way money is? An incredibly useful accounting trick that is used so frequently it feels fundamental, but really it's just a mathmatical convenience?

Small aside: From this perspective 'conservatipn of energy' is a redundant statement. Of course energy must be conserved or else the equations are wrong. The definition of energy is it's conservation.

133
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Music is just layered simple patterns and our brains LOVE IT.

Sound is pressure waves, musical notes are a specific pattern of pressure waves. Melodies are repeated musical notes. Songs are repeated melodies following standard structure.

Our brains love trying to decode and parse all these overlapping patterns.

Maybe not really a shower thought and more wild speculation.

25
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This is a hard ask. I'm honestly not sure it's possible.

60
What do you create? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I just decided to start asking this instead of 'what do you do?' when meeting people. Figured I'd try it out on you folks.

[-] [email protected] 60 points 7 months ago

It is a really interesting, very scary technology that requires a solid institutional foundation to provide trust. Musk degrades trust, he doesn't build it.

125
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 92 points 10 months ago

Always warms my heart to see the amount of respect these athletes have for their competitors. Sometimes people are awesome!

[-] [email protected] 89 points 1 year ago

I honestly needed to hear this today, so thank you. I'm at work trying to work out someone else's uncommented code and have just been staring at it mumbling to myself. I'm new to the position so I'm anxious my new coworkers will think I'm just dicking around... This is the validation I needed. Thanks everyone!

[-] [email protected] 193 points 1 year ago

It is a politically savvy and ethically correct move. Really nice when those line up.

[-] [email protected] 128 points 1 year ago

But we can't get a database for firearms?

[-] [email protected] 117 points 2 years ago

Wow, sharks @439mya, Polaris @70mya. They're more than 6 times older! This is NUTS!

21
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

What preparations do you take when moving outdoor plants indoors for the winter? I'm mostly worried about bringing bugs inside. What techniques do you use to ensure you don't get infested over the winter?

44
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The way I see it, the major barrier to countries implementing carbon taxes is the fear their economic competitors won't do the same, therefore hindering their economic growth needlessly. A valid concern.

Why don't some nations build an 'opt in' style Free Trade Agreement that allows any country to join as long as they prove they have implemented and enforced a carbon tax. Those countries then have high financial incentives to only trade within the 'carbon tax block' and any country outside is at a serious trade disadvantage.

I've (quickly) looked and have not found anything like this proposed (which is frankly crazy).

Would you support your country jumping into this FTA?

What are the unforeseen downsides or objections to a plan like this?

[-] [email protected] 66 points 2 years ago

Then you plead the 5th. Pretty sure that's exactly what it's intended for.

12
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

Yondoza

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago