[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You sure? IDK man, you know, you could be sleeping while she slits your throat.

She seems honest IMO.

311
I can fix her! (infosec.pub)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The mental state is the problem... imagine one of them suddenly dies.

16
Take my damn upvote! (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
148
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
12
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
101
Why did I ask 🤦 (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

In the cheap one, we have two perfectly flat brass pieces pressing against each other.

I'll bet you any ammount you want, that's not brass. It's iron with brass coating.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago

So? It's not like you're gonna get banned here, lol 😂.

1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It's an older PC, a P4 I use as a radio streamer mostly, so the install is x86.

The problem is, audio seems to play back faster. I have it set up to boot up the streaming application after boot (Tuner, about 20 seconds after boot since it uses a spinning IDE HDD, so the rig is slow on boot) and sometimes (rarely) everything will be fine, the playback speed will be fine. But, most of the time, the audio plays back faster. In some rare cases, I've also noticed it can play slower as well. Also, if the audio is fine after Tuner starts and you change radio streams, back to square one, it starts playing the audio faster.

I tried running other applications, like VLC and Audacious to see if the same thing is happening in them. Yep, the same thing. I still haven't tried Winamp with wine.

I still use PulseAudio on that rig. I didn't see a reason to switch since it did it's job, I don't really need anything fancy on it, just a workable audio out was all I needed.

Also, I have no idea when this actually started happening (everything worked fine when I set it up a few years ago, 1.5 or 2 years ago I think) since I haven't used it in a while as a streamer, but I needed to use it now. I thought it might be a kernel/driver bug, so I rolled back a snapshot a few months ago (I think a snapshot that still had some 5.x version of the kernel), and it did kinda work (the fast playback speeds were less sporadic) but it didn't eliminate the problem completely.

Please, tell me what commands to run on this thing, I'll do it and post the output. It uses an onboard audio card, some old Intel card part of the chipset I think. Here is the output from lspci regarding the audio.

Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 01)

I'm thinking PulseAudio is so outdated now that it causes problems like these on certain chipsets/audio controllers, but I'm not sure. I know I'll have to eventually switch to PipeWire, but I was hoping I could ride the PulseAudio train a little longer.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 2 years ago

It works either way, apt or apt-get.

122
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Arrr, me hearty! Ye be askin' for a simple piece o' code in Rust, peppered with pirate comments. Here be a wee program that prints a hearty greeting:

fn main() {
    // Avast, me hearties! We start our voyage here.
    let greeting = "Ahoy, matey! Welcome aboard!";

    // Yo ho ho! We print our greeting to the open sea!
  println!("{}", greeting);
}

Now ye be havin' a taste o' pirate-infused Rust code! If ye be havin' any more requests or need further assistance, feel free to speak up, and I'll be at yer service!

24
Supply side jesus rule (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

The boobs are nice though 👍.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There should have been a note saying NOT to join the top most instances. I know registration with them is without manual aproval (you register, log in, that's it), but they're overloaded. Trust me when I say this, it's better to wait a few hours for your account to be approved on another less loaded instance than to have the account right there and then on an overloaded instance.

Instances I would recommend: vlemmy.net and feddit.nl.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

A very expensive power cord setup for audiophiles... it's snake ~~blood~~ oil basically.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

Poor little buggers 😂.

140
sh.itjust.works right now (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

MegasXLR, Two Stupid Dogs, Courage, Billy and Mandy, Evil Concarne, Chowder... so many good shows...

3
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
8
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This platform could be a viable alternative for forums (cuz we know in which state they currently are), but the lack of general attachments (any mime/file type) is what I believe stands in the way. I have an electronics forum I run (a local one, nothing too serious) and I believe Lemmy can make it more intereactive (not die out) because people from all over the world will get the feed and not just people that are online on the forum at that time.

Still, we frequently exchange PDFs, schematics (not always in image form), archives, etc., which makes Lemmy useless if there are no plans to implement something like this, even if disabled by default.

So, are there plans for anything like this being implemented?

2
Me waiting for DNS changes (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago

If it really is only a few days, yeah, I'd wait it out.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I hear ya... no SATA ports gets me in a bad mood as well.

view more: next ›

PCChipsM922U

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF