[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

What is "left-pad"? If it does what I think it does, doing that with a LLM would be very wasteful.

EDIT: I remember the event now. Obviously you wouldn't use a dependency for that. I think I understood your comment now anyway.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 14 points 1 week ago

Where is the archive?

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 15 points 2 weeks ago

Not something for general users but, for organisations and public figures, having a platform with only verified entities is valuable.

For general users: Mastodon and the Fediverse.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 32 points 4 weeks ago

It was born as a villain from the very beginning.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 15 points 1 month ago

Bounce off from 3.20% to 3.19%? Not the wording I'd use.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 22 points 1 month ago

If you turn VPN off, you lose.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 16 points 3 months ago

That one was compromised. The good fork is "I still don't care about cookies".

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 8 points 3 months ago

If all the people they killed come back alive and they're still banned, all the killing they did wasn't the reason for the ban.

...but they won't come back.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 14 points 3 months ago

Yeah, at some point the cat is both behind and in front of the pillow.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 25 points 8 months ago

I will not watch ads. That's the first, unbreakable premise. If the service does not provide videos, I leave the service.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 8 points 8 months ago

Good. However, if the intent is to discourage driving in central London, the penalty should not be an fixed rate for each vehicle. It should be a dynamic rate based on how much the people in the car earn. Otherwise you are only displacing people with low salary while freeing the roads for the rich that don't care to pay £30.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 7 points 8 months ago

It's not unreasonable, but if after taxing 3rd and 4th homes (etc.) to oblivion the issue persists, then also second homes should be taxed high. I truly believe that extreme would not be needed once it's made humanely forbidden to own multiple homes without intention of ever living in them.

Worth adding that it should not be the number of homes what should be taxed, but based on the market value of those properties.

view more: next ›

cristian64

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago