Do you have any legit resources for the first one? How did you get started?
I down voted because that was an incoherent rant. Sober up and try again.
You could argue that when they started cracking down on account sharing it quadrupled the price for many people.
Jurisdiction dependent, but where I live, the fine increases, and eventually leads to jail time.
Quick, raise prices!
5 posts in the last week vs 100s of moderation actions taken in the last week. Thats actually a really good hit rate, which suggests that the system actually works really well.
Criticizing that system without offering any better alternative isnβt useful.
Disagree. Pointing out flaws in a proposal is important, it raises awareness so that they can be resolved.
In the jury system, content could be hidden as soon as it is reported
True of all moderation systems, but is open to abuse. Removing content, even temporarily is good way to censor opinions, by hiding them until they fall off the "new" page. Moderation usually happens quite slowly if the mods arent terminally online. A jury system may exacerbate that if the jurors aren't available to respond in time.
Penalising false reports also risks discouraging reports, and may actually just encourage "group think". And if accounts are easy to spin up, there is no real cost to abusing reports to hide content.
I actually think the current systems are actually adequate. We have a moderators who can be replaced at any time by admins, which gives oversight, and we have the ability to simply move communities to other instances if that fails.
Had a quick look at your doc, and the juries idea does not sound good.
-
Moderation is not something loads of people want to do. Take a look at the list of unmoderated communities: https://programming.dev/u/Vacant - Forcing random users to be involved would likely annoy your users.
-
For certain types of reports, CSAM, gore, etc, you absolutely do not want to share that to random users. If your users are underage, it could be illegal to do that anyway, but sensitive users may not want to be exposed to triggering content.
Maybe you make being in the jury opt-in, but if most don't opt in your back to regular old moderation by the few who have the stomach for it.
It shouldn't be red...
Wait until you hear about bin lids!
Entirely dependant on the company culture, and the legal protections for workers. It isnt that simple.
Anyone have the odds on how long it will take for this to be circumvented?