But you see, externalized profits don't count. Externalities are for losses only.
They weren't called the "me generation" for nothing!
Or having it taken to pay for medical care and whatnot if they don't.
https://www.denofgeek.com/tv/star-trek-lower-decks-canon-settle-debate/
The direct answer to the question “Is Star Trek: Lower Decks canon?” is yes. And that’s because the creator — Mike McMahan — has said its canon, and the show actually bends over backwards to make canonical references.
So yeah, everything from the Pakled war to that stupid toy "SPOCK" helmet is canon now.
I know he's the most important person in Starfleet history, but even so, I find it sus that he could do in two weeks what the starship designers couldn't figure out at all with essentially unlimited time and resources. Surely their "miracle worker" engineers aren't all in deep-space postings on starships or space stations, right?
They also talked about deporting 100 million people. There aren't that many non-citizens in the entire country.
So when RFK Jr says that every person who lost their insurance is illegal, what he means is that folks low enough on the socioeconomic ladder to have lost your insurance are being made illegal and will end up counted among that 100 million, even if you're natural-born citizens. Defend yourselves accordingly.
Not quite. The low burden job was what he'd already been doing after Wolf 359, starship design at Utopia Planitia (working on the Defiant, which is why he knew about it). Reassigning him to DS9 was his CO's attempt to kick him out of that rut and get his career back on track, and he almost resigned over it.
DS9: no, see, you don’t understand, we NEED the Defiant. And do you expect us to just, what? NOT use it?
The Defiant was what Sisko was working on between Wolf 359 and getting command of the station. Of course he wanted it!
It's a dark pattern to steal your data.
"Sorry for the convenience" -- Mitch Hedberg
I'm gonna need a link to that '80s sitcom intro video.
I mean, I was overstating my case a little bit. To be fair, Riker and Boimler are the only actual examples we have of it (at least by that particular method), and Rutherford's bet was more about that sort of wacky situation being "a Boimler kind of thing to happen" (possibly paraphrased).