Higher price and no convenience… one need to go in the village, hope someone is at home, endure the social interaction… because few shops carry beekeepers produce. Notably because tax avoidance. So it’s not exactly a walk in the park as a consumer.
C’est… alambiqué…
Following the logic of one of my beloved enterprise data architect everything should use UUIDs as way of refer to an entity… so more like
Wouldn’t be practical to pronounce but otherwise no more problem of gimmicky names :)
Et donc c’est la faute aux jeunes qui de toutes façons ne sont plus tellement intéressés par le travail… qui n’est que secondaire pour la subsistance de chacun à priori.
Perso en tant que relativement vieux et donc dans l’ancien régime j’me considère comme relativement chanceux mais touts les ptis gen z qui seront victimes des licenciements de groupe à coût réduit pour leurs employeurs vont trouver ça moyen…
Enfin bref, ça ferme encore la porte derrière eux c’est super.
Not that actually doing it isn’t absolutely horrible but wait till you have children, at about 7yo they invite 8 of their friends in your house and it’s pouring outside.
The idea of sedating them will eventually come in mind. Then obviously you’ll discard it.
And come the moment of cleaning the mess they inevitably leave you’ll wonder if you should have done it.
Sure but even looking a only the financial produce of one person for a family dwarfs the comical 23k here. And that’s not even looking at the emotional side of things. 23k is straight insulting imho.
Is there a legitimate reason why « we » globally care about their opinion ?
Expensive. Everything is now so damn expensive suddenly.
That’s a bit of an extreme take on the topic… not wanting ads from the broadcaster is one thing, not wanting to be separately presented with the promotional items of the youtuber himself is something else. I like seeing what the guys I follow are putting out. Maybe a 2nd option in ads content would be appropriate for you but don’t throw everyone in the same bag…
As an outsider I fail to understand why the reason to close shops is so critical. Can’t they just say « fuck it we’re done here » at any point in time? What’s the point on pinning the closure on fictional crime level?
They say sharing so it’s solely duplicating data everywhere, effectively increasing the attack surface…
And this would violate my favourite GDPR principle ; purpose based consent. I give my data to the healthcare body for handle reimbursement and I like it that way. No need for them to share that data with anyone else. Same for the tax guy: let him scrutinise the shit outa my incomes but that’s it, don’t share it with the fucking police or whoever else.
But yeah… this is a difficult topic even in a sane country. We’re talking USA here…