That's for sure their wolfsangel symbol, thanks. Doesn't the photo misidentify the symbol though? The wolfsangel isn't an SS logo afaik, and the blurry insignia looks more like a 44 than SS.

Damn right, fuck war and fuck imperialists.

By the way,

you can find pictures of Zelensky posing with his own countries soldiers wearing swastikas

Got a link? My leftist group chat doesn't believe this, and I can't find anything myself that's not obviously doctored.

Thanks, uh, I'm not SkyezOpen. Sorry if I interrupted your conversation.

Putin is a capitalist oligarch that should have never led Russia

you can find pictures of Zelensky posing with his own countries soldiers wearing swastikas

So you're saying that on OP's infographic we should be supporting neither Ukraine or Russia? Or should we be slightly to the right on the Russia-Ukraine axis because it's better to support a capitalist oligarch using Nazi rhetoric than not supporting anyone?

Is that the right fallacy? What's the strawman?

Notices how [corrupt] people [...] would very reasonably cause their constituents to have complaints like [...]

Thanks. Sounds like you're saying the issues I mentioned could be signs of corruption, but are not corruption in themselves? Which is true for sure, but they don't necessarily imply corruption.

And in this particular case, they get scrutinized and very little actual corruption is found.

I'm really enjoying it

Always assuming the best case scenario is the best possible way to get completely fucked over.

I agree, but here we are talking about reality, not assumptions. In this particular context, the majority of cases are as I describe. It's completely justified to keep these things under intense scrutiny (Denmark is relatively transparent and has a functioning critical press across interests and political spectra), but if you assume the worst you start seeing corruption where there might be none.

And to say they don't describe corruption is demonstrably false.

I'm not sure I see that, but I could well be wrong. Would you care to demonstrate?

Cool!

By making a photonic guitar the same size and shape as an acoustic the photonic guitar will resonate at the same wavelengths.

Are these resonances in the guitar body itself, or in electric wires inside the body, or some third thing? Would changing the shape of the body necessarily change the resonant frequencies, or is it only certain parts of the body that are involved in that?

Looks cool!

It wasn't just like a guitar, it is a guitar. I suspect some people reading this don't believe me but that's ok, neither did my old physics grad school at first. Same with the patent office.

Okay, I'll bite. What makes this a guitar rather than a synth or other electric music component?

What makes this an instrument even, if you can't make music using your own body?

Also, would you call a piano a type of guitar? It's just a bunch of strings tied to a resonating body after all.

• Assface

• Boobies

• Orgasmo

lol

Sure, but you need a way to identify whether an object is a person. That's a lot less simple.

I think he's doing like an anime blush?