Me? I'm not going to. I don't have influence or power. But I will support those that do, and my tiny amount of support makes it easier, rather than accepting that nothing can change.
So disqualify the countries with influence. Not as simple. Still fair.
Ok? This is likely true. What is your point? It is not easy or convenient. But easy and convenient do not make right or wrong, moral or immoral, legal or illegal.
Should have added "no mistakes, no bugs" to the prompt! Pffft, amateur.
This argument is ludicrous. Something either is or is not moral, and is or is not illegal. Being caught and convicted doesn't change that. It was illegal. It was immoral. It should be investigated. Countries that commit warcrimes should be sanctioned, and countries with influence should not be above the law.
Ok? I....I agreed there should be? I'm not sure what your point here is?
Is this the first calorie source found in space?
That isn't equivalent because Ukraine did not commit warcrimes. Why shouldn't a country committing warcrimes be blocked?
I assumed so, but I like to put up a defense sometimes, because otherwise people only see their nonsensical points.
Why not? Why allow a country committing war crimes to participate on the global sports or entertainment stage like everything is normal?
Different people need this man's confidence.
Crappfully yours,
Dual_sport_dork