don’t worry. as always, resources will be allocated according to wealth, so those in power will not be bothered by inconvenient consequences, and will be able to stay the course of aiding in the conduct of an illegal war and genocide.

not many parliaments are a source of pride these days…

“Iran is a very unserious country, their negotiator shit his pants during the meeting, can you believe it?”

Iran has been very trustworthy lately.

Iran: If you do A I will do B

USrael: *does A*

Iran: *does B*

USrael + Western Media: *surprise pikachu face*

solve the problems that cause people to vote afd, not by drowning more people in the mediterranean, but by tackling their economic precarity.

sadly the capitalist-centrist alliance is not capable of this, economic precarity makes great workers.

also institute a general cordon sanitaire against the afd, don’t allow cdu to make the false equivalence between afd and die linke.

again, very hard for the capitalist-centrist alliance, die linke is namely the only party that actually posed a threat to them.

Make clear to the democratic machine that the only way to win power, is by including the left in their coalition. This means not voting for them if they don’t, but organizing and voting in primaries to try to force them to do.

This is not an imaginary track, this has worked in the past. If you have two oligarchic parties, you solve nothing by (only) voting for the least bad one.

It is solely up to the discretion of the Nobel-peace-prize committee, which war criminal, war monger, or propaganda tool is to be the recipient.

The symbolism is hilarious.

Bunch of mouth-foaming rightwing ideologues spending all their political capital on a monument directly implying that there are no victims of communism.

Given that they have already designated all Palestinians as being terrorist this feels like the legal preparation for the next phase, maybe even the final phase…

The article does not mention the evidence basis, so I will keep my comment general. In the Netherlands similar accusations were made against Lucia de Berk, the evidence was based on opinions of superiors and colleagues plus the statistical unlikelihood of so many patients dying under her supervision. But crucially there was never any direct evidence that she deliberately killed patients, and in the end it turned out that she didn’t. She was particularly unliked by her colleagues because she was a sex worker in the past and that is why she was given the worst shifts (and coincidentally the shifts where more patients die). In the end her life was ruined by her colleagues and the judiciary system not understanding statistics (5 percent of all nurses have a statistically-significant high death rate). Again this case could be a real psychopath but the fact that they don’t mention the evidence basis makes me think of Lucia de Berk.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucia_de_Berk_case

If you think this is cowardice then you must not yet have developed object permanence.

This is the main role of the democratic party, keep the left down and keep the capitalist happy. They will cynically adopt any issue - that doesn’t threaten that prime directive - for a few months, be it black lives matter or trans rights, and then drop them again once it’s no longer convenient.

But if any real leftist candidate (with huge democratic support and winning based on broadly popular policies), ever comes close to power, all defense mechanisms kick in.

Maybe it’s time to restart some some old Greek traditions and propose a law that anyone proposing chat control - from here on out - gets banished for life from entering European soil ever again.