Yeah, but it can be filled in with "house".

Everytime the supreme Court does something batshit that allows Trump more power, I wonder if this is what Godel was worried about.

If LLMs just copied stack overflow they'd respond to every question with "Closed as duplicate. Question already answered."

I think the easiest way to describe how it feels is it is like having a tooth taken out.

You've had it removed because the pain is too much, and now finally that pain is gone, but instead you're sat there feeling puffy and swollen from the recent trauma, and you're just constantly aware of this gap where there used to be something present.

Just like going to the dentist, it gets better though. And I'd do it again in a heart beat if I had to make the same decision.

I mean it's important to distinguish between actual scientific tests and random managerial bullshit and wasting a day on "training".

The scientific test, assuming this is real science, and not more random crap found on a website, will just be based on observation. People with autism tend describe individual pictures while neurotypicals tend to impose a narrative on the whole collection.

There's no good or bad here, they're different ways of describing the world. You don't win if you're more autistic or neurotypical or whatever.

On the other hand training days like you're describing are always a complete waste of time. The aim is to turn up, do the minimal amount of engagement to make it look like you're a team player, and then just try to fit in with everyone else. There's is no point in wasting time thinking about course materials. The guy who wrote them was just bullshiting.

If it makes you feel better, if it was actually sunrise on summer solstice at Stonehenge, there would have probably been people in the pictures. I've heard it gets busy.

It's not really legal in the UK. It's unenforceable on claims under 5k and for claims over 5k the courts will make a case by case decision if arbitration is appropriate.

https://www.herbertsmithfreehills.com/insights/reports/inside-arbitration/click-to-agree-technology-and-consumer-arbitration

However, lots of companies still add these bullshit clauses as a way to bully people out of seeing a lawyer.

They forgot to mention he's funding a PAC that is financing most of Trump's campaign workers. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/26/trump-voter-turnout-elon-musk-pac

Let's hope it's as well run as Twitter.

I remember playing Max Payne. There was some battle in a bar against a guy with a shotgun. If you timed it right between reloads you could run up to the guy, stand on the bar so your guns were exactly level with his face and empty two Uzi clips point blank into his face before he could reload.

Then you would run out of ammo and he would one shot kill you.

Yeah, I used to date someone from one of the richest families in Guangzhou (at least pre revolution). When the revolution came they hid a shitload of wealth, in the form of antiques, gold, and foreign assets.

Don't get me wrong. They got shipped off to camps, and lost most of their money. But those that survived the cultural revolution were still richer than almost everyone else.

Social capital is important, but real capital helps a lot too.

Polywork is when you get fucked by multiple bosses.

He's already been defeated soundly at the voting booth. That's why there was an insurrection.

We really should be moving to consequences part of the constitution instead giving Trump yet another chance to steal power.

We get in trouble if we fail everyone because we made them do a novel synthesis, instead of just repeating what we told them.

Particularly for an intro course, remembering what you were told is good enough.