1
10
FediForum is Back! (wedistribute.org)
submitted 2 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

After a two month postponement, a lot of community feedback, and organizational restructuring, FediForum is happening once again starting June 5th!

2
14
submitted 11 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3
20
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30324960

We're thrilled to announce the launch of our crowdfunding campaign! This campaign is focused on our PeerTube mobile app. You can read more about why we are doing this crowdfunding campaign and how we want to improve our mobile app in the blog post!


PeerTube is a decentralized and federated alternative to YouTube. The goal of PeerTube is not to replace YouTube but to offer a viable alternative using the strength of ActivityPub and P2P protocols.

Being built on ActivityPub means PeerTube is able to be part of a bigger social network, the Fediverse (the Federated Universe). On the other hand, P2P technologies help PeerTube to solve the issue of money, inbound with all streaming platform : With PeerTube, you don't need to have a lot of bandwidth available on your server to host a PeerTube platform because all users (which didn't disable the feature) watching a video on PeerTube will be able to share this same video to other viewers.

If you are curious about PeerTube, we can't recommend you enough to check the official website to learn more about the project. If after that you want to try to use PeerTube as a content creator, you can try to find a platform available there to register or host yourself your own PeerTube platform on your own server.

The development of PeerTube is actually sponsored by Framasoft, a french non-for-profit popular educational organization, a group of friends convinced that an emancipating digital world is possible, convinced that it will arise through actual actions on real world and online with and for you!

If you want to contribute to PeerTube, feel free to:

If you want to follow the PeerTube project:

4
-3
submitted 16 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Sembra che ci siano nuvole all’orizzonte per il film su Clayface, uno dei villain più particolari di Batman. Fin dall’annuncio, il progetto aveva generato un mix di curiosità e scetticismo, ma ora, con alcune indiscrezioni trapelate dietro le quinte, sembra che la strada verso la realizzazione sia tutt’altro che liscia. Sarà l’ennesima sfida per James Gunn e Peter Safran, che hanno preso le redini del DC Universe con l’obiettivo di rivoluzionarlo.

5
22
submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Ibis is a federated encyclopedia with numerous features. If you want to start a wiki for a TV series, a videogame, or an open source project then Ibis is for you! You can register on an existing instance or install it on your own server. Then you can start editing on the topic of your choice, and connect to other Ibis instances for different topics. Federation ensures that articles get mirrored across many servers, and can be read even if the original instance goes down. Ibis is written in Rust and Webassembly, fully open source to make future enshittification impossible.


With this version Ibis can finally federate with other Fediverse platforms such as Lemmy (example) and others. If you notice any federation problems please open an issue. Note that Mastodon currently ignores activities sent by Ibis for unknown reasons. See the article for more details how federation works.

There are many improvements to signup and account management. Admins can configure OAuth so that users can login with existing accounts from other platforms. Email is also supported now, with a config option email_required to enable email verification for new users. Notifications can also be sent by email if desired. And there is an account settings page to change password and email.

When creating a new article, users can choose which instance it should reside on. Admins can remove articles, making the config option article_approval obsolete. Various other parts of the api were also changed. Additionally the code was split into different crates for faster development. There have also been many bug fixes and minor improvements.

If you are interested what a federated wiki can do, join and give it a try. You can register on ibis.wiki, open.ibis.wiki or other instances. You can also install Ibis on your own server. It is very lightweight and can easily run on an existing server alongside other software. This release includes an additional installation method using Docker. To discuss the project, report problems or get support use the following links:

Lemmy | Matrix | Github

Here is a (somewhat messy) list of all the changes in this version.

6
-1
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I've been thinking lately about how much of the web's metadata—like link previews, rich snippets, and structured content—relies on centralized standards like:


Open Graph (by Meta)

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Graph_Protocol

https://www.opengraph.xyz/

https://ogp.me/

https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/what-is-open-graph-and-how-can-i-use-it-for-my-website/


and


Schema.org (by Google, Microsoft, Yahoo!, and Yandex)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema.org


These formats are widely used for things like link previews in social media, product listings in search engines, event markup, and more.

Open Graph lets websites control how their content appears when shared (e.g., title, description, preview image), and Schema.org provides a broader vocabulary for marking up structured data like reviews, articles, events, etc.

But both are effectively governed by large, centralized entities.


This makes me wonder:

Has anyone ever proposed, or worked on, a federated or community-governed alternative to these standards?

Something open-source and consensus-driven that better fits the ethos of the Fediverse?


I imagine such a system could:

Empower smaller platforms and content creators.

Improve interoperability across decentralized platforms.

Prevent a few big players from shaping metadata standards to suit themselves.


I’d love to attempt something like this, but I currently lack the time, energy, and technical skill.

Still, I wanted to throw the idea out there in case it sparks interest, or someone knows of prior attempts.

Would love to hear your thoughts, links or brainstorms.

7
35
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
8
9
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30017182

Any website that implements ActivityPub APIs properly can federate with other sites as part of the fediverse.

In the light of the above ☝️ statement and in the context of the given lemmy post, l am presenting three websites as an example :

https://zessa.in/

https://urthy.in/

https://1ness.in/

Can such websites be created and made to federate as a part of the fediverse ?

9
22
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

On mastodon, I'm starting to be followed by accounts I have no relationship with at all (a famous guy I doubt would ever follow me, a supposed magazine about a subject I never talked about and with a name not really related to the subject of their posts...).

Is this a trend? Is it a strategy to get people to follow them back so they have more followers? Is this the fediverse version of spam?

10
14
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I’ve noticed that most online spaces for witches and covens—like:

Mandragora Magika,

JaguarMoon Cyber Coven,

Inked Spirit Coven,

Missing Witches,

Lunar & Wild Coven,

Witchcraft Academy Coven (Patreon),

Reddit r/Wicca

Wiccan Whispers,

Various Discord/Facebook groups,

etc.

—are centralized or rely on closed platforms.

Even the more “community” oriented ones, such as WitchBook or PaganSquare, are siloed and not interoperable with each other.

Given the rise of the Fediverse and its ability to host decentralized, community-driven platforms (Mastodon for microblogging, Pleroma for lightweight social feeds, PixelFed for image sharing, Lemmy for Reddit, PeerTube for video, etc.), has anyone ever thought about potentially attempting a federated network specifically for witches, covens, and pagan practitioners?


Some possible use cases:

Federated coven “instances” where each group can moderate its own space but still connect with others
Resource sharing (spells, rituals, book clubs, event calendars) via ActivityPub
Privacy and inclusion features for marginalized practitioners
Integration with platforms like PixelFed for sharing altar photos, PeerTube for ritual videos, and Mastodon/Pleroma for discussions and announcements


Does anyone know of any ongoing projects like this, or have thoughts on how such a network could be structured?

What challenges do you foresee (moderation, privacy, drama, etc.), and what features would be most valuable to the witch/pagan community?

I’d love to try building or contributing to something like this, but unfortunately I lack the ability and energy.

Still, I think the idea is worth discussing.

11
19
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/29836089

This update implements a lot more user requested features. The main one is the addition of the cross-post badge. The cross-post badge will show up whenever a post has been cross-posted elsewhere. Tapping the badge will show you the other places it was posted to.

This update also makes the bottom nav bar more stable, so hopefully it shouldn't jump around as much.

Please take a look below to see the full list of changes.

Full changelog

  • Add option to filter posts by URL.
  • Add setting to display inline images as links in private messages. Default: on.
  • Add support to show a list of communities a post was cross-posted to.
  • Add setting to toggle whether cross-post badges should be shown.
  • Add setting to configure whether the app delays loading large datasets until the UI is settled. This was always on before. This just adds a setting to turn it off. Default: on.
  • Fix a bug where some images fail to share.
  • Fix more navigation bar issues.
12
18
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Know Your Meme (KYM) is a long-established platform that documents and researches internet memes, viral videos, catchphrases, and more. It uses a hybrid model of community wiki-style contributions and professional editorial oversight, making it a rich historical archive of online culture. Originally part of Rocketboom in 2007, KYM was later acquired by Cheezburger Network (2011) and then Literally Media (2016). It's even recognized by the U.S. Library of Congress.

However, as comprehensive and useful as KYM is, it's still a centralized platform. That centralization limits control, transparency, and long-term resilience, especially when meme culture itself thrives in decentralized, community-driven spaces.

This got me thinking: has anyone ever considered a decentralized and federated alternative to KYM? Something built on the ActivityPub protocol (like Lemmy, Peertube, Mastodon, etc.), where communities could:

Document and archive memes in a federated, self-hosted way

Vote on or curate meme entries collaboratively

Link meme evolution across different cultural and regional instances

Provide transparency around edits, sourcing, and moderation

Preserve meme culture beyond the control of a single corporate entity

A federated “MemePedia” of sorts could better reflect the chaotic, democratic nature of meme creation and diffusion online.


Unfortunately, I don’t have the technical skill or time to build this myself, but I’d love to discuss the idea, see if anyone else has thought along similar lines, or maybe even hear about any existing initiatives.

What do you think?

Is this something worth attempting?

13
400
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Feddit.org announced today that they are changing their rules to match German law despite their server not being hosted in Germany.

Feddit.org now bans

  • The sentence "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free"

  • Comparing Israel to the Nazis

  • Calls to end Zionism

  • Calling for the dissolution of Israel

And much more. The full original post can be found here, or

Click here for full text of original post:

Hi.

In the past few days, discontent regarding mod decisions in this community has been brewing, particularly when it comes to comments on Palestine, Israel, and Israeli politics and actions. There are also misunderstandings regarding mod intention and German law. We hope to clear that up with this post.

While the servers of feddit.org are in Austria, most of the mods of this community as well as admins of this server live in Germany. Speaking of, our server admins have also posted a write-up on the same topic.

And with that, let's go:

In Germany, antisemitism is specifically sanctioned in German criminal law, both for speech and as a motivation for other criminal behavior. In addition, Germany seeks to protect the Jewish state of Israel (the so-called "Reason of State" introduced in 2008) and thus verges toward protecting Zionism as well. Certain criticism of Israel/Israelis is also categorized as "Israel-related antisemitism".

Since criminal law is involved, enforcement can mean things like police raids and device confiscations. After such police action, it does not really matter if it was appropriate or if cases are dropped or never charged: The damage is done. All told, it's not that fun.

There is also no point in engaging in discussions about the veracity of statements that could get us into legal trouble. In addition, we believe that you can express most opinions without breaking rules.

If your comment contains the following, it will be removed from this community:

  • Calling for the dissolution of Israel, or calling for a one-state solution without specifying equal rights for all people; Jewish in particular.
  • Calling for a destruction, annihilation, an end of all Zionism or the like.
  • Equating Israeli actions and (historical) Nazism.
  • The slogan "from the river..."
  • Endorsement of or justifications for Hamas or Hezbollah, or slogans or graphics positively referring to these organizations. These are considered terrorist organizations in Germany.
  • ... and obviously: Any of the common antisemitic tropes or calls to violence against Jews or Israelis

Comments will not be removed for the following:

  • Denouncing genocide.
  • Denouncing Israeli war crimes.
  • Criticizing Zionism as an ideology or political movement.
  • Referring to the current Israeli government as "criminal," "expansionist," or "far-right".

If your comment is removed nonetheless, these are not the reason. I'd also like to stress that this community was never a free-speech-absolutist zone: It is a (usually lightly) moderated community. There may also be times when bans go too far. In such cases, please DM the @[email protected] account (which all mods have access to).

spoiler To help you understand why, I'll leave an assortment of sources here (translations via DeepL).

  • A news report:

    Berlin in mid-May [2024] around 6 o'clock in the morning. A loud, continuous "banging" against the apartment door wakes student Alina T. from her sleep. [...] When her husband opens the door, several LKA officers, two employees of the district office and the SEK "storm" past him into the apartment. Puzzled, he looks at the search warrant. [...] The background to this was a Facebook entry in the student's profile: "From the river [...]

  • A legal treatise:

    In November 2023, the Federal Ministry of the Interior and for Home Affairs also issued a prohibition order against Hamas.[60] According to the order, "the slogan 'From the River to the Sea' (in German or other languages)" is a distinguishing mark of Hamas[61]. [...] the current legal situation [regarding "Denial of Israel's right to exist"] is - contrary to what the statements of the Federal Ministry of Justice suggest[63] - anything but clear. Whether incitements to eliminate the State of Israel are prosecuted depends on the respective legal opinion and the prosecution will of the respective public prosecutor's office.

  • Press release from the previous government:

    In this context, Section 111 StGB, which covers public incitement to commit crimes, may also be relevant. Incitement to extinguish Israel's existence by force may be punishable under this provision. The same applies to calls to publicly display the Hamas flag. If Hamas attacks are publicly cheered and celebrated, this may also be punishable. This means that people who cheer on Hamas's actions or publicly express their sympathy with the attacks may constitute the criminal offence of "approval of criminal acts" under Section 140 of the German Criminal Code (StGB).

  • Another news report

    In connection with the controversial Palestine Congress in Berlin, the German authorities have also imposed an entry ban on former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis. "In order to prevent antisemitic and anti-Israel propaganda at the event", several entry bans have been issued, the news agency AFP learned from security sources on Sunday. One of these concerned Varoufakis. (Notably, Varoufakis would have spoken about one-state solutions ...)

  • Overview Germany in 2024 by Amnesty International

  • Overview Germany in 2024 by Human Rights Watch

federal reverse (on behalf of the mods of !europe)


:::

14
36
My Dream Fediverse Platform (deadsuperhero.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I've been on the Fediverse for nearly 15 years now. I've seen platforms grow, change, and evolve, and I've taken inspiration from projects that have a lot of really good ideas.

This is a conceptual pitch / brain droppings on Postmodern, the Fediverse platform I hope to eventually build.

15
5
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

geteilt von: https://feddit.org/post/12164533

via [email protected] :

🎉 Introducing Welcome, a new fediverse onboarding experience powered by #FediDB.

Give it a try, and spread the word ✨

16
5
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
17
1
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Is there any way to achieve the same level of anonymity on the Fediverse as 4chan offers?

18
14
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This is just a random idea I had, and I'm curious what others think.

Has anyone ever considered potentially attempting a federated, anonymous imageboard/message board—something in the spirit of 4chan, 8chan, or Plebchan, but using ActivityPub or another decentralized protocol?

What technical, social, or legal obstacles would need to be overcome?

Would federation (like ActivityPub or something custom) actually help, or would it just replicate the same problems at scale?

I know these platforms have reputations that turn people off (and often for good reason), but I still think there's value in the format—especially for niche or "grey zone" communities that often get booted from mainstream platforms.

Plebchan already shows that decentralization can work in this space. It’s serverless, adminless, and built on the Plebbit protocol, which itself is a decentralized, peer-to-peer social media protocol. Plebchan just acts as a frontend for Plebbit, which uses IPFS for data distribution.

I’d honestly love to try building something like this myself, but I don’t have the dev skills or the time.

Still, I wonder:

Has anyone tried federating something like Plebchan or building an ActivityPub-compatible client like it?

What challenges would something like this face, both technically and socially?

Would there be room for such a project in the Fediverse, or would it be rejected outright due to associations?

Genuinely curious to hear others' thoughts.


Plebchan: https://plebchan.org/

Plebchan Github: https://github.com/plebbit/plebchan

Plebbit: https://plebbit.com/

19
10
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

On another post, I shared a thought I've been having. Here's another one:

Would it be possible to create a platform for federated link share and discussion? That's one of the things I really miss - the possibility to discuss, with a group of like minded people, content I stumble upon on the internet.

The image is just another provocation, of course. ;-)

20
21
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I've been seeing these "why not federated " popping up here from time to time, so i figured I could make two suggestions (a suggestion and a question, really) that have been popping up in my mind as well.

Let me ask the question first, in this post, and make the suggestion on another post, to keep the discussion clean:

Wouldn't it be better to have the fediverse be a server only (like mail, or usenet - as federated as can be) and then have clientes like mastodon, lemmy, whatever... be just clientes to that server?

The post would have fields like author, date and time, subject or title, text resume, text content, image, link, video, x, y, z, ... Then clientes would fetch whatever they are interested in (maybe mastodon would focus on author, date, image and text resume, pixelfed on image, peertube on video, lemmy on all of them... a blog would fetch the author, the date, the title, possibly text resume to use as lead, and text content and display that as a blog entry...

Information could, then, just flow via jason, xml (xmpp, why not)

Maybe I'm being naive here, but would very much like to understand why.

Of course the server would authenticate and distribute to other servers and to clientes what they ask for.

The image is a little provocation, of course ;-)

21
20
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Just a random thought that I had: what if there were a federated, Open-source, lyrics platform—something open and community-driven, where users could submit, edit, and annotate song lyrics, similar to how Mastodon or PeerTube works for social and video content?

In theory, it could even offer an API that centralized music platforms (Spotify, TIDAL, Deezer, Qobuz, etc.) might choose to tap into. Think of it as a libre lyrics backend with federation support.

I’d absolutely love to see or even contribute to something like this, but I don’t currently have the skills or energy to pull it off myself. Has anyone explored this idea before?

22
9
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

(Random Thought That I had.)

Proposal:
Has anyone considered developing a federated, open-source alternative to platforms like:

Google Earth,

Magic Earth,

Google Maps,

Waze,

Here WeGo,

Sygic GPS,

OsmAnd,

etc.?

Imagine a decentralized platform where individuals and organizations can host, contribute, and share mapping, weather, navigation, geospatial data, etc. —fully in the spirit of the Fediverse.

Key Features Could Include:

  • Decentralized hosting of map tiles, satellite imagery, and user-contributed data
  • Federated sharing of points of interest, routes, and real-time traffic
  • Privacy-focused navigation and offline capabilities
  • Integration with existing open data sources (e.g., OpenStreetMap)
  • Extensible with plugins for specialized uses (hiking, cycling, accessibility, etc.)

Why This Matters:
Current navigation and mapping platforms are largely centralized, raising concerns about privacy, data ownership, and censorship. A federated approach would empower communities, ensure data resilience, and foster innovation—much like Mastodon, Lemmy, PeerTube, etc. have done for social media and video.

Personal Note:
I’d love to help build something like this, but I currently lack the time, expertise, and energy. Still, I wanted to float the idea and see if others in the Fediverse community are interested or already working on similar projects.

Open Questions for the Community:

  • What technical hurdles would need to be addressed for federation (e.g., syncing map data, real-time updates)?
  • Are there existing projects or protocols that could be extended for this purpose?
23
9
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/11177574

Medienwissenschaftler Martin Andrees Vortrag auf der Dreikönigstagung in Zürich zur Monopolstellung von GAFAM (Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple und Microsoft) und zu den Möglichkeiten die wir als Gesellschaft haben, etwas dagegen zu unternehmen.

24
17
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
25
8
Do 13+ instances exist? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I know world is not. I wanna make one but haven't rn.

view more: next ›

Fediverse

19589 readers
39 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS