[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

As we discussed before, linking both accounts in the bio achieve the goal

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago

Great minds think alike!

[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Thank you for notifying us!

[-] [email protected] 11 points 7 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago
34
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I forgot that you are selective with your tolerance with hyperbole.

Hyperbole in this context is borderline disinformation.

“Trump Musk filter”

This filter offers a choice when the users signs up. The new joiner can enable it completely, moderately, or not at all. So in this case, it is indeed the users' choice.

This is what it looks like in the user settings

“Vote weighting”

Do we expect every single user to assess all of the toxic communities, or do we prefer to rely on admins to make decision for the userbase?

In the same way that defederation is an admin-level decision impacting all of the userbase, having those defined at an admin level seem reasonable.

“Attitude and Reputation scoring”.

This is visible for users as well, I guess I misunderstood what you meant? https://piefed.social/u/[email protected]

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Our findings show that the abuse rate for the .zip TLD is 0.20% which is close to the average compared to all other TLDs. This rate indicates that .zip domain names are not being used to attack users more than the average TLDs - at least for now. However, if attackers find they have better success using .zip than other TLDs, the rates of abuse might change.

Given new TLDs, such as .zip, tend to have a higher abuse rate than legacy and ccTLDs we suggest that the security research community should continue the healthy debate about the potential risks of the .zip TLD and that internet users continue to be weary of downloading and opening files with a .zip extension or TLD from sources or individuals they may not know.

https://dnsrf.org/blog/the--zip-tld---ripe-for-abuse--but-so-far-so-good-/index.html

Choosing to use this TLD basically just screams ignorance, and should be causing users to question the competence of the person who made that choice.

Not sure if that tone is the best for a healthy debate.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

every single one of those features

First features presented: site name, tagline, sidebar, announcement and icons.

Why would those be managed at the user level?

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

Your family members are on Lemmy?

124
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
118
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
9
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
174
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
198
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/37857048

chore: set default instance to lemmy.zip, remove lemm.ee

Thank you for all your work!

45
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/45876492

Context: I tried to use the Piefed migration feature to migrate [email protected] to [email protected]

https://piefed.social/c/barcelona now exists, with all the existing posts there, as well as the icon and description.

It even moved some subscribers (there are around 100 now), from what I understand those were Piefed subscribers that got automatically moved.

The one caveat is that from Lemmy instances, the community doesn't have show old posts (see https://lemm.ee/c/[email protected]), but if you were restarting a community from scratch you wouldn't have access to your old posts anyway.

This ensure that at least the posts are transferred to a community on an active instance, which is probably the main concern for lemm.ee communities at the moment.

171
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Context: I tried to use the Piefed migration feature to migrate [email protected] to [email protected]

https://piefed.social/c/barcelona now exists, with all the existing posts there, as well as the icon and description.

It even moved some subscribers (there are around 100 now), from what I understand those were Piefed subscribers that got automatically moved.

The one caveat is that from Lemmy instances, the community doesn't have show old posts (see https://lemm.ee/c/[email protected]), but if you were restarting a community from scratch you wouldn't have access to your old posts anyway.

This ensure that at least the posts are transferred to a community on an active instance, which is probably the main concern for lemm.ee communities at the moment.

17
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

Blaze

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF