The problem is how easy you can have a 100% disaster and 100% not-a-problem when the usercase is...well, 1.
So.... you're gonna lower the price, right?
Right?
One year ago, right at the beginning of the petition, PirateSoftware came out misreading the initiative by suggesting the idea the petition was about forcing indie developer to host their server, at their expense, forever and other stupid idea on this line. A fabricated these narrative to act as the typical popular youtubers that say endlessly: "this is st0pid, they are st0pid". The fabricated narrative confused other popular YouTubers with mixed feelings; and there was very little support. This assured PirateSoftware the first place on the youtube rankings when you search for "stop killing games", plus had lot of kids brainwashed into thinking " this is st0pid". This kind of criticism never went away completely, the were partially silenced by the very recent roaring as people understood correctly what it was actually about. As SKG keep hitting its milestone the angered roar did lowered, so now you can ear again the "this is st0pid" team
jiggle physics daughters, to be precise.
addendum: Denuvo is sick of “toxicity,” says people only hate it because it works
...or the videogame is known to make views on youtube.
Anyway, this don't undermine the intention of the developer.
Can’t or won’t?
"money"
IMHO: Valve is phasing off the very initial gen. of Steam Deck to focus OLED/HDR (which would benefit Linux gaming ecosystem), as SteamDeck is certainly a standard defining device for Linux gaming ecosystem.
Don't forget the cutshare
29 = (8.7 to Valve) (20.3 Pocket)
7m are on Xbox, so the count is:
Pocket = 243.6 m (on 12m copies sold)
Valve = 104.4 m ( on 12m copies sold)
Driver for VGA/HDMI?
How much minimal that kernel is?
Can't be 25% = it could be correct if the "other 25%" was 24 or 26 (or even 25.000001). Since there are two 25%, the 25% change is raised, nullify the 25% prediction. Can't be 50%, because there are other two different options in addition to fifty in fifty-fifty; so 50% (or fifty-fifty) don't exist as option.
Can't be 0%, because 0% is a very specific assertion that can't ever be true due to paradox (if you "guessed", you nailed it 100%)
Result: malformed question, no one is valid... The best you can have is 25%, which is still wrong, but I thing is the closer to approximate. Ideally the question would reform as:
Option A: 25% Option B: 50% Option C: 0%
=33.3~%